Wierd Senses!

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:09 am

Wierd Senses!

by rdxb » Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:06 pm
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as
distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to
have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of
stimulating the other senses. However, recent
research has discovered that some people taste a
banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a
color and say that it has a specific smell. This shows
that such people, called synesthesiacs, have senses
that do not respect the usual boundaries between the
five recognized senses.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general,
systematic impairment in their ability to use
and understand words.
(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there
are other senses besides sight, touch, smell,
hearing, and taste.
(C) The particular ways in which sensory
experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a
definite pattern.
(D) The synesthetic phenomenon has been
described in the legends of various cultures.
(E) Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their
synesthetic experiences by the use of drugs.

I'll let you know the OAA

This is a question from PowerScore GMAT CR bible, though I know the answer and the explanation.... Am just wondering how some of you guys would attempt it... Feeling as if Its just me who's getting all the answers wrong :(
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:19 am
Location: Orlando
Thanked: 6 times

by raajan_p » Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:46 pm
Conclusion: synesthesiacs have senses
that do not respect the usual boundaries between the
five recognized senses.

Evidence given: research has discovered that synesthesiacs taste a
banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a
color and say that it has a specific smell.

Assumption: I am assuming that senses difference exhibited by synesthesiacs are legit and that there is no impairment with these people.

Now, I need to weaken this assumption...look for the answer choices..I bet A fits the bill nicely...

(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general,
systematic impairment in their ability to use
and understand words.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:43 am
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices