Also guyz i found something else in the argument to be made note of. The option B says that the disinfectant can reduce the immunity level and option C says that disinfectant will weaken the immunity level. There is a difference between 'can' and 'will'. The conclusion cannot be framed as the thing will happen, we can only say that the thing can happen.
Guyzz what do you think as based on the above thinking i differentiated between B and C and came to option B.
CR Inference
- [email protected]
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
- Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
- Thanked: 63 times
- Followed by:14 members
- [email protected]
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
- Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
- Thanked: 63 times
- Followed by:14 members
Hello Ron, I solved this cr and eliminated all the options and was left with B and C. I chose B as B has the wording as 'can' and C option says that disinfectant will weaken the immune system which is not at all given in the stimulus. So my answer is B. Please reply is it right??
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
that's also a factor -- it's much easier to justify statements with "can" than to justify statements with "will".[email protected] wrote:Hello Ron, I solved this cr and eliminated all the options and was left with B and C. I chose B as B has the wording as 'can' and C option says that disinfectant will weaken the immune system which is not at all given in the stimulus. So my answer is B. Please reply is it right??
again, i refer you to OG12 #70, as i pointed out earlier in the thread -- in all important respects, it's exactly the same problem as this one.
have you already seen OG12 #70?
-- if you *have* already seen that problem but you're still having trouble with the same concepts in this problem, then that indicates that you aren't learning enough from the practice problems that you're already doing.
in this case, go back to the OG and make sure that you are doing all of the following:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/550-to-720-i ... tml#330724
-- if you have *not*, then why are you using third-party sources when you still have fresh OG questions?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
Ron U just explained how to go about the SC section. Could You also tell us how should someone review for RC and CRlunarpower wrote:that's also a factor -- it's much easier to justify statements with "can" than to justify statements with "will".[email protected] wrote:Hello Ron, I solved this cr and eliminated all the options and was left with B and C. I chose B as B has the wording as 'can' and C option says that disinfectant will weaken the immune system which is not at all given in the stimulus. So my answer is B. Please reply is it right??
again, i refer you to OG12 #70, as i pointed out earlier in the thread -- in all important respects, it's exactly the same problem as this one.
have you already seen OG12 #70?
-- if you *have* already seen that problem but you're still having trouble with the same concepts in this problem, then that indicates that you aren't learning enough from the practice problems that you're already doing.
in this case, go back to the OG and make sure that you are doing all of the following:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/550-to-720-i ... tml#330724
-- if you have *not*, then why are you using third-party sources when you still have fresh OG questions?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
the linked post contains a boldface heading that says "for all verbal problems..."mundasingh123 wrote:Ron U just explained how to go about the SC section. Could You also tell us how should someone review for RC and CR
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
Ron,
I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.
1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)
No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)
So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.
1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)
No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)
So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
Although spraying disinfectant on toys in preschools generally kills most germs that cause illnesses, such as the common cold, many pediatricians no longer recommend this practice. Exposure to germs that cause the common cold and other non-dangerous illnesses helps young children to develop a degree of immunity to fight other, more serious pathogens.
If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?
(A)
Disinfecting toys for germs can reduce the spread of a variety of communicable diseases among children who attend preschools.
(B)Disinfectant can reduce children's immunity to serious illnesses by reducing the chance that children are exposed to germs that cause common illnesses.
(C)
Disinfecting toys for the germs that cause the common cold weakens young children's immune systems.
(D)
The more common cold-causing germs a small child is exposed to, the less severe the common cold will be if the child does contract it.
(E)
The field of pediatrics is currently focused on limiting young children's exposure to germs, especially germs spread in public places like schools and playgrounds.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
Can anyone explain my doubt?
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ron,
I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.
1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)
No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)
So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
Although spraying disinfectant on toys in preschools generally kills most germs that cause illnesses, such as the common cold, many pediatricians no longer recommend this practice. Exposure to germs that cause the common cold and other non-dangerous illnesses helps young children to develop a degree of immunity to fight other, more serious pathogens.
If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?
(A)
Disinfecting toys for germs can reduce the spread of a variety of communicable diseases among children who attend preschools.
(B)Disinfectant can reduce children's immunity to serious illnesses by reducing the chance that children are exposed to germs that cause common illnesses.
(C)
Disinfecting toys for the germs that cause the common cold weakens young children's immune systems.
(D)
The more common cold-causing germs a small child is exposed to, the less severe the common cold will be if the child does contract it.
(E)
The field of pediatrics is currently focused on limiting young children's exposure to germs, especially germs spread in public places like schools and playgrounds.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
i don't see a question here, and it's not clear what you are actually asking me. what are you actually trying to ask?karthikpandian19 wrote:Ron,
I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.
1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)
No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)
So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
you don't need the terminology or concepts of formal logic on this exam. in fact, having your mind cluttered by such things will make it much harder to solve the problems.2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
Anyway thank you for your asking ........... meanwhile i got clarified with the doubt
Thanks
Thanks
lunarpower wrote:i don't see a question here, and it's not clear what you are actually asking me. what are you actually trying to ask?karthikpandian19 wrote:Ron,
I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.
1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)
No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)
So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
you don't need the terminology or concepts of formal logic on this exam. in fact, having your mind cluttered by such things will make it much harder to solve the problems.2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" ---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---