CR Inference

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

by [email protected] » Sun May 29, 2011 5:41 am
Also guyz i found something else in the argument to be made note of. The option B says that the disinfectant can reduce the immunity level and option C says that disinfectant will weaken the immunity level. There is a difference between 'can' and 'will'. The conclusion cannot be framed as the thing will happen, we can only say that the thing can happen.
Guyzz what do you think as based on the above thinking i differentiated between B and C and came to option B.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

by [email protected] » Sun May 29, 2011 9:26 pm
Hello Ron, I solved this cr and eliminated all the options and was left with B and C. I chose B as B has the wording as 'can' and C option says that disinfectant will weaken the immune system which is not at all given in the stimulus. So my answer is B. Please reply is it right??

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:27 am
[email protected] wrote:Hello Ron, I solved this cr and eliminated all the options and was left with B and C. I chose B as B has the wording as 'can' and C option says that disinfectant will weaken the immune system which is not at all given in the stimulus. So my answer is B. Please reply is it right??
that's also a factor -- it's much easier to justify statements with "can" than to justify statements with "will".

again, i refer you to OG12 #70, as i pointed out earlier in the thread -- in all important respects, it's exactly the same problem as this one.

have you already seen OG12 #70?

-- if you *have* already seen that problem but you're still having trouble with the same concepts in this problem, then that indicates that you aren't learning enough from the practice problems that you're already doing.
in this case, go back to the OG and make sure that you are doing all of the following:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/550-to-720-i ... tml#330724

-- if you have *not*, then why are you using third-party sources when you still have fresh OG questions?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:03 am
lunarpower wrote:
[email protected] wrote:Hello Ron, I solved this cr and eliminated all the options and was left with B and C. I chose B as B has the wording as 'can' and C option says that disinfectant will weaken the immune system which is not at all given in the stimulus. So my answer is B. Please reply is it right??
that's also a factor -- it's much easier to justify statements with "can" than to justify statements with "will".

again, i refer you to OG12 #70, as i pointed out earlier in the thread -- in all important respects, it's exactly the same problem as this one.

have you already seen OG12 #70?

-- if you *have* already seen that problem but you're still having trouble with the same concepts in this problem, then that indicates that you aren't learning enough from the practice problems that you're already doing.
in this case, go back to the OG and make sure that you are doing all of the following:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/550-to-720-i ... tml#330724

-- if you have *not*, then why are you using third-party sources when you still have fresh OG questions?
Ron U just explained how to go about the SC section. Could You also tell us how should someone review for RC and CR
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:41 am
mundasingh123 wrote:Ron U just explained how to go about the SC section. Could You also tell us how should someone review for RC and CR
the linked post contains a boldface heading that says "for all verbal problems..."
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:00 am
Ron,

I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.

1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)

No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)

So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)

2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
Although spraying disinfectant on toys in preschools generally kills most germs that cause illnesses, such as the common cold, many pediatricians no longer recommend this practice. Exposure to germs that cause the common cold and other non-dangerous illnesses helps young children to develop a degree of immunity to fight other, more serious pathogens.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?

(A)

Disinfecting toys for germs can reduce the spread of a variety of communicable diseases among children who attend preschools.
(B)Disinfectant can reduce children's immunity to serious illnesses by reducing the chance that children are exposed to germs that cause common illnesses.

(C)

Disinfecting toys for the germs that cause the common cold weakens young children's immune systems.
(D)

The more common cold-causing germs a small child is exposed to, the less severe the common cold will be if the child does contract it.
(E)

The field of pediatrics is currently focused on limiting young children's exposure to germs, especially germs spread in public places like schools and playgrounds.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:30 pm
Can anyone explain my doubt?
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ron,

I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.

1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)

No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)

So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)

2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
Although spraying disinfectant on toys in preschools generally kills most germs that cause illnesses, such as the common cold, many pediatricians no longer recommend this practice. Exposure to germs that cause the common cold and other non-dangerous illnesses helps young children to develop a degree of immunity to fight other, more serious pathogens.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?

(A)

Disinfecting toys for germs can reduce the spread of a variety of communicable diseases among children who attend preschools.
(B)Disinfectant can reduce children's immunity to serious illnesses by reducing the chance that children are exposed to germs that cause common illnesses.

(C)

Disinfecting toys for the germs that cause the common cold weakens young children's immune systems.
(D)

The more common cold-causing germs a small child is exposed to, the less severe the common cold will be if the child does contract it.
(E)

The field of pediatrics is currently focused on limiting young children's exposure to germs, especially germs spread in public places like schools and playgrounds.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:50 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ron,

I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.

1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)

No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)

So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
i don't see a question here, and it's not clear what you are actually asking me. what are you actually trying to ask?
2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
you don't need the terminology or concepts of formal logic on this exam. in fact, having your mind cluttered by such things will make it much harder to solve the problems.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Sun Jul 08, 2012 9:18 pm
Anyway thank you for your asking ........... meanwhile i got clarified with the doubt

Thanks
lunarpower wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ron,

I have a 2 different doubt about the general concept. It may be simple for you to clarify.

1. This sentence is with reasoning as: (let me know if i am wrong)

No Disinfectant causes germs (X causes Y), Germs causes Illness (Y causes Z), Illness helps gain immunity (Z causes A)

So can we infer X causes A (No disinfectant gains immunity)
i don't see a question here, and it's not clear what you are actually asking me. what are you actually trying to ask?
2. What is CONTRAPOSITIVE? I read thru some article, but sure on its concept?
you don't need the terminology or concepts of formal logic on this exam. in fact, having your mind cluttered by such things will make it much harder to solve the problems.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:19 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by mv12 » Sun Jul 08, 2012 10:23 pm
I marked B