Top Executives

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:16 am
Thanked: 9 times

Top Executives

by El Cucu » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:43 am
Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.
C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.

OA is D
Last edited by El Cucu on Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:680

by Alara533 » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:41 pm
The portions are not boldfaced in the passage!!
El Cucu, could you pls do it.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:16 am
Thanked: 9 times

by El Cucu » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:58 am
Alara533 wrote:The portions are not boldfaced in the passage!!
El Cucu, could you pls do it.
Sorry was in a rush...Here we go. Tks

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:36 pm

by thestrongest » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:23 am
seems to be very challenging. Anyway, IMO A.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:680

by Alara533 » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:50 pm
IMO its D

A & B can be ignored as the first statement is not the summary. Its just the intermediate conclusion. The summary/conclusion is that - they might be over optimistic.

C says the first part correct. But the second part is not an evidence. The author uses 'might' which means he is guessing.

E is wrong because it says- the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion. But second statement is not a further conclusion supported by the first statement.

D says that the first bold statement is an intermediate conclusion and the second bold statement is the actual conclusion. Which I think is correct!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:14 am

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 2:06 pm
I like the explanation on A.