Greek inscriptions - would love to hear from Experts

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:36 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members
Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the
eighth century B.C., a strong case can be made that the Greeks actually adopted alphabetic
writing at least two centuries earlier. Significantly, the text of these earliest surviving
Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and sometimes from left to
right. Now, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and in the process
they would surely have adopted whatever convention the Phoenicians were then
using with respect to the direction of writing. Originally, Phoenicians writing ran in either
direction, but by the eighth century B.C. it had been consistently written from right to left for
about two centuries. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which
of the following roles?
A. The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish; the
second is that position.
B. The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish; the
second presents an assumption on which that argument relies.
C. The first is an assumption that the argument concludes is unjustified; the second presents part
of the grounds for that conclusion.
D. The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument
seeks to establish; the second is that position.
E. The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument
seeks to establish; the second is a judgment that is introduced in order to call into question
the relevance of that evidence.


As per my knowledge assumption are unstated premises in any argument. So going by this can we readily knock options B & C out??
--------------------------------
Don't forget to hit the "Thank" button,if you find above information helpful. :)
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 11:25 am
Location: Worldwide
Thanked: 1 times

by QuotEd » Thu May 09, 2013 3:15 pm
Which two sections were bold-faced?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:36 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by killerdrummer » Fri May 10, 2013 6:06 am
Oopsy!!! Here you go...

Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the
eighth century B.C., a strong case can be made that the Greeks actually adopted
alphabetic writing at least two centuries earlier
. Significantly, the text of these earliest
surviving Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and sometimes from left to right.
Now, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and in the process they
would surely have adopted whatever convention the Phoenicians were then using
with respect to the direction of writing.
Originally, Phoenician writing ran in either
direction, but by the eighth century B.C. it had been consistently written from right to left for
about two centuries.
--------------------------------
Don't forget to hit the "Thank" button,if you find above information helpful. :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Wed May 15, 2013 7:51 pm
The question as you have posted has not correct answer! It is another slightly modified question that no longer has the right answer.

I discussed this exact question 3 years ago and did the research to find the correct question. I will post the correct question here.

"Explanation follows, but first we need to clarify a couple of things.

There is a very similar question that is number 77 in the OG 12th edition. In that question the correct answer does not mention an assumption.

I also found the question that you have posted here in several forums. But with different answer choices.

Here is that Question:

"Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the eighth century B.C., a strong case can be made that the Greeks actually adopted alphabetic writing at least two centuries earlier. Significantly, the text of these earliest surviving Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and sometimes from left to right. Now, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and in the process they would surely have adopted whatever convention the Phoenicians were then using with respect to the direction of writing. Originally, Phoenician writing ran in either direction, but by the eighth century B.C. it had been consistently written from right to left for about two centuries.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second reports a discovery that has been used to support a position that the argument opposes.

B. The first is the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second presents an assumption on which the argument relies.

C. The first presents evidence that is used in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second presents an assumption on which the argument relies.

D. The first is an objection raised against a position that the argument opposes; the second is the position that the argument seeks to establish.

E. The first is an objection raised against a position that the argument opposes; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position."



You can see that the portions in bold are the same, but the answer choices are different. The question, as you posted it does not have a correct answer, since the main conclusion of the argument is the first portion in bold.

The correct answer to this question is B.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Wed May 15, 2013 7:52 pm
As to your main question of how the answer can be an assumption, Now here is a different situation. In this case, the second bold portion is stated not as a fact, but as an inference or additional deduction made in light of the fact stated earlier in the sentence that "the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians." This second bold portion is not even a proper inference because there is not enough information to state that this must be true.

Because the second portion is not stated as a fact, but as an inference or conclusion that has been drawn - based on insufficient evidence, then it is an assumption. In this case the word "assumption" means that the statement is made with insufficient evidence and so the truth of the statement is not supported but is taken for granted, or "assumed." A fact cannot be assumed if it is stated, but other statements can.

Does that help?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course