- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
It is a mistake to give post office employees individual discretion as to when to inspect or open suspicious packages. If individual employees are allowed to open "suspicious" packages without first following a strict protocol, it is only a matter of time before all packages will arrive having already been opened due to some postal employee's idle curiosity.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
Postal service managers are the only people with the authority to open suspicious packages.
Suspicious packages are indistinguishable from all other kinds of package.
The efficiency of the postal service will be greatly reduced if more packages are inspected.
There is currently no protocol in place for the inspection of suspicious packages.
Postal employees desire to open packages out of curiosity.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank"
---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank"
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---












