-
pradeepkaushal9518
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:5 members
The Consultant provides no evidence indicating that lawmaker's argument has significantly overestimated the cost of maintaining the board.
The consultant argues by introducing an additional factor that supports the existence of board and which has been overlooked by the lawmaker. So choose option D.[/spoiler]
