Reasoning and answers required for few CRs.

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:14 pm
Thanked: 3 times
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.
The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?
(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.
Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.
If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturer's argument
(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company
(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company
(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company's own business
(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business
(E) establishes that even the mining company's business will prosper if the mining company's proposal is rejected


Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.
(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.
(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.
(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970's than it did in the 1960's.
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.


Advertiser: The revenue that newspapers and magazines earn by publishing advertisements allows publishers to keep the prices per copy of their publications much lower than would otherwise be possible. Therefore, consumers benefit economically from advertising.
Consumer: But who pays for the advertising that pays for low-priced newspapers and magazines? We consumers do, because advertisers pass along advertising costs to us through the higher prices they charge for their products.
Which of the following best describes how the consumer counters the advertiser's argument?
(A) By alleging something that, if true, would weaken the plausibility of the advertiser's conclusion
(B) By questioning the truth of the purportedly factual statement on which the advertiser's conclusion is based
(C) By offering an interpretation of the advertiser's opening statement that, if accurate, shows that there is an implicit contradiction in it
(D) By pointing out that the advertiser's point of view is biased
(E) By arguing that the advertiser too narrowly restricts the discussion to the effects of advertising that are economic

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.
The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:59 am
Location: London
GMAT Score:640

by BrianSmith » Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:53 pm
wow - what a spree! I only have time to answer one:

#2 -- IMO it's C. The wire manufacturer shows that if copper price was high in the US, other countries wouldn't buy wire from the US and the manufacturer would stop buying copper from the US, damaging the mining company's business.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:56 pm
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:720

by singhag » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:20 am
IMO

1 D
3 C
4 A
5 D

Please verify the answer...justification will follow.

Kindly use spoiler while answering the question.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

by dtweah » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:27 am
A C C C A

1
According to the study the probability of drivers and front seat passengers being severely injured for not wearing seat belt is .8. So its complement is .2 If this .2 number is accurate, we cannot GREATLY reduce the probability of .8. But if the complement is .3, for example, that probability is .7 and so on. The assumption follows.

B talks about the entire county and not the survey so it is out

C makes comparison b/w front and rear which is not needed

D undermines the conclusion and does not allow it to be properly drawn

E is utterly irrelevant

3

We are told the reason teenagers are priced out b/c " employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help" Anything that shows employers can pay extra can weaken. Of all the choices this weakens the most, though it is hardly a strong "weakener".

A Shows correlation b/w the two rates and actually strengthens rather than weakens. If min wage rates are higher, that increases the extra amount employers will have to come up with to pay teenagers, an even greater disincentive. Strenghens.

B If teenage UE rate increases while min wage remains constant, the increase could still be due to employers considering the constant min wage too high, so it still doesn't weaken.

D. Comparison between 1970 and 1960 rates does not weaken.

E. merely potentially or partially contradicts info in the passage and does not weaken. Occasional declines can be followed by increases and we have a wash.


4.

Only this describes accurately what the consumer does. These question types test your ability to DESCRIBE Effectively

A Consumer doesn't allege anything
B Consumer doesn' question
D Pointing out bias is not the consumer thing. Or there is no bias to be pointed out.
E. The consumer does not deal with economic effects. If anything he deals with determinants, or causes: Advertising is the CAUSE of Higher PRICES, not the Effect.


5

NANB would/might be picked up during these other routine screenings, and these 10% donors might be treated for NANB and not have it, making the conclusion not to be properly drawn. So if we assume they don't have other infections that can be screened, and their only screening is the current one which is weak, then we are assured that about 10% of the donors will always have NANB.

B is a play on the above but fails on the "develop the diseases themselves" part. If they develop the disease, they may be among the 10% percent already mentioned so nothing new is added. We still need our assumption.

C. Identifying underestimates can hardly be an assumption

D. Even if it is lower, it still doesn't say that 10% of the donors MUST have NANB. The 10 percent can be drawn from this lower number.

E. Utterly Irrelevant and meaningless

Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:21 pm
[spoiler]D
A
B
C
A[/spoiler]

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:48 pm
[spoiler]A
C
B
C
A[spoiler][/spoiler][spoiler][/spoiler]

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:51 pm
dtweah wrote: A C C C A

1
According to the study the probability of drivers and front seat passengers being severely injured for not wearing seat belt is .8. So its complement is .2 If this .2 number is accurate, we cannot GREATLY reduce the probability of .8. But if the complement is .3, for example, that probability is .7 and so on. The assumption follows.

B talks about the entire county and not the survey so it is out

C makes comparison b/w front and rear which is not needed

D undermines the conclusion and does not allow it to be properly drawn

E is utterly irrelevant

3

We are told the reason teenagers are priced out b/c " employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help" Anything that shows employers can pay extra can weaken. Of all the choices this weakens the most, though it is hardly a strong "weakener".

A Shows correlation b/w the two rates and actually strengthens rather than weakens. If min wage rates are higher, that increases the extra amount employers will have to come up with to pay teenagers, an even greater disincentive. Strenghens.

B If teenage UE rate increases while min wage remains constant, the increase could still be due to employers considering the constant min wage too high, so it still doesn't weaken.

D. Comparison between 1970 and 1960 rates does not weaken.

E. merely potentially or partially contradicts info in the passage and does not weaken. Occasional declines can be followed by increases and we have a wash.


4.

Only this describes accurately what the consumer does. These question types test your ability to DESCRIBE Effectively

A Consumer doesn't allege anything
B Consumer doesn' question
D Pointing out bias is not the consumer thing. Or there is no bias to be pointed out.
E. The consumer does not deal with economic effects. If anything he deals with determinants, or causes: Advertising is the CAUSE of Higher PRICES, not the Effect.


5

NANB would/might be picked up during these other routine screenings, and these 10% donors might be treated for NANB and not have it, making the conclusion not to be properly drawn. So if we assume they don't have other infections that can be screened, and their only screening is the current one which is weak, then we are assured that about 10% of the donors will always have NANB.

B is a play on the above but fails on the "develop the diseases themselves" part. If they develop the disease, they may be among the 10% percent already mentioned so nothing new is added. We still need our assumption.

C. Identifying underestimates can hardly be an assumption

D. Even if it is lower, it still doesn't say that 10% of the donors MUST have NANB. The 10 percent can be drawn from this lower number.

E. Utterly Irrelevant and meaningless
In 1, how D undermines the conclusion ?

In 3, what technique is used to derive C ?

In 4, what is the contradiction? It says advertsments help lower cost of newspaper. He says that they pay for advertisments. SO, the fact that ads lower publishing cost is still valid ?

In 5, could you kindly shed more light on your explanation above ?