Printing Press

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:6 members

by niksworth » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:14 am
My answer would be C.

This is because if books, post printing press, were bought (in larger quantities) by the same people who bought them earlier as well, then the number of people who learned to read not have increased. C states this.

I am particularly interested to know the source.

Look at option E - It states a conjecture and asks us to assume it to be a fact. Not a good choice at all.
scio me nihil scire

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:15 am
Location: 127.0.0.1
Thanked: 15 times

by gmatrix » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:27 am
my pick C

what if it was not the number of people who learned to read that increased but the people who earlier bought expensive manuscripts....now bought more number of books because the costs fell thus increasing the total numbers of books sold......this takes the wind out of the argument.
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:37 am
IMO C.

Increase in literacy is attributed to printing of books.

option C weakens the argument by saying that large proportion of the books were bought mainly by people who bought the books earlier. This means that the number of people did not increase much. Hence we are not sure of the literacy rate.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)

Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:31 am
selango wrote:Image

Please explain ur answers
my answer is also C

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:44 am
Do you have any more LSAT questions in this format?
Yep.

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:23 pm
IMO C . D is second contendor , but will not work because it expects more assumptions than C that is friends etc started buying copies as well instead of reading from their friends.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:12 members
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:57 pm
GMATMadeEasy wrote:IMO C . D is second contendor , but will not work because it expects more assumptions than C that is friends etc started buying copies as well instead of reading from their friends.
C - Correct, since the author argues that the number of readers jumped because the number of books sold were also jumped. But this statement weakens the authors conclusion by saying that the number of books sold increased because the readers who earlier purchased the manuscript could now afford many printed books instead of one manuscript copy. Thus, this option states that though the number of copies sold increased, the number of readers remained same.

Hope it helps!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:30 pm
OA C

Source:LSAT
--Anand--