BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR1000 T1 #18-Vacuum Cleaner

Expert replies
by joyseychow » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:38 am
Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.

Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?
(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.
(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.
(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.
(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by tanviet » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:40 am
I do not see the answer. no choice weaken the arguement
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:53 am
i like D

to weaken the critics' position:
critics say: seminars are ill-conceived/badly designed-> waste of money.

D : there is an alternative cause for the ineffectiveness of the seminars. the bad design of the seminars is not the only cause. weakens the critics' position.
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:05 am
i think correct choice would be A coz in D its talking about the poor design and that is out of scope as in the question it is given that seminars are ill conceived ans waste of money so we need to be in those boundary and think of the other reason. So by POE A would be the better choice as it says that "Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars. " that means the companies who sent the employees to the seminar are not the ones whose sales were highest so it might be possible that these companies have lower sales before going to the seminar or the sales are not sensitive to the seminar, rather to something else that affected these companies even before the seminar..
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:41 am
A Seminars had participation only from companies whose sales were NOT the highest. So, seminars had no impact on their sales.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:03 am
agree on A. thanks iamctse and ketkoag!
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 3:49 am
I also agree with answer A
Join the discussion