BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Surgical Newtape

Expert replies
by perfectstranger » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:23 am
The only purpose for which a particular type of tape is needed is to hold certain surgical" wounds closed for ten days—the maximum time such wounds need tape. Newtape is a,new brand of this type of tape. Newtape's salespeople claim that Newtape will improve healing because Newtape adheres twice as s long as the currently used tape does.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously call into question the claim made by Newtape's salespeople?

(A) Most surgical wounds take about ten days to heal.
(B) Most surgical tape is purchased by hospitals and clinics rather than by individual surgeons.
(C) The currently used tape's adhesiveness is more than sufficient to hold wounds closed for ten days.
(D) Neither Newtape nor the currently used tape adheres well to skin that has not been cleaned.
(E) Newtape's adhesion to skin that has been coated
with a special chemical preparation is only half as
good as the currently used tape's adhesion to such
coated skin.

Please explain the assumption behind it a detailed explanation will be welcome thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:38 am
IMO:C

Stimulus says : Newtape will improve healing because Newtape adheres twice as s long as the currently used tape does.


C:The currently used tape's adhesiveness is more than sufficient to hold wounds closed for ten days.

IF currently used tape is sufficient to heal there is no need for newtape..

E:Talks about some other factor which might b helpful ....But that is not what d argument is about..


thx
Join the discussion

by reachac » Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:40 am
imo c
Join the discussion

by kiranlegend » Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:16 pm
IMO C or E.. will go with E

what is OA?
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:01 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by kiranlegend » Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:05 am
OA, pls?
Join the discussion

by keepsmilinyaar » Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:56 pm
IMO C

OA PLZ??
Join the discussion

by iwill » Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:03 pm
IMO E. OA please
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:11 am
i will choose C.
i states that adhere of the newtape is redundancy comparing with the old one. while the old one is sufficient for 10 days adherent to wounds.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

Re: Surgical Newtape

by kshin78 » Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:50 pm
perfectstranger wrote:The only purpose for which a particular type of tape is needed is to hold certain surgical" wounds closed for ten days—the maximum time such wounds need tape. Newtape is a,new brand of this type of tape. Newtape's salespeople claim that Newtape will improve healing because Newtape adheres twice as s long as the currently used tape does.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously call into question the claim made by Newtape's salespeople?

(A) Most surgical wounds take about ten days to heal.
(B) Most surgical tape is purchased by hospitals and clinics rather than by individual surgeons.
(C) The currently used tape's adhesiveness is more than sufficient to hold wounds closed for ten days.
(D) Neither Newtape nor the currently used tape adheres well to skin that has not been cleaned.
(E) Newtape's adhesion to skin that has been coated
with a special chemical preparation is only half as
good as the currently used tape's adhesion to such
coated skin.

Please explain the assumption behind it a detailed explanation will be welcome thanks
IMO E.

C does not weaken the claim that Newtape will improve healing but E does.
Join the discussion

Re: Surgical Newtape

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:56 pm
perfectstranger wrote:The only purpose for which a particular type of tape is needed is to hold certain surgical" wounds closed for ten days—the maximum time such wounds need tape. Newtape is a,new brand of this type of tape. Newtape's salespeople claim that Newtape will improve healing because Newtape adheres twice as s long as the currently used tape does.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously call into question the claim made by Newtape's salespeople?

(A) Most surgical wounds take about ten days to heal.
(B) Most surgical tape is purchased by hospitals and clinics rather than by individual surgeons.
(C) The currently used tape's adhesiveness is more than sufficient to hold wounds closed for ten days.
(D) Neither Newtape nor the currently used tape adheres well to skin that has not been cleaned.
(E) Newtape's adhesion to skin that has been coated
with a special chemical preparation is only half as
good as the currently used tape's adhesion to such
coated skin.

Please explain the assumption behind it a detailed explanation will be welcome thanks
It's definitely (c).

Let's look at some key facts from the argument:
The only purpose for which a particular type of tape is needed is to hold certain surgical wounds closed for ten days—the maximum time such wounds need tape.
(e) is the first time we hear about the special chemical preparation. We have no clue if and when this preparation is used, so (e) must be outside the scope.

Here's an important tip for evaluating choices: if you read a choice and think "well, that would be a good answer if I had another piece of information", if you do NOT have that other piece of information, the choice is outside the scope and is wrong.

Newtape's big selling point is that it lasts twice as long as the currently used tape. However, if (c) is true, then since we know that 10 days is the maximum relevant time, Newtape's claim is worthless.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 1:52 am
I will Go with option C in this case.
Join the discussion