BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

all dogs are descended

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

all dogs are descended

by gmatmachoman » Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:21 am
Although all dogs are descended from the
wolf and the jackal, the various breeds of
dog are so different from one another that
it hardly seems possible that they had a
common ancestry.

(A) are so different from one another that
it hardly seems possible that they had
a common ancestry.
(B) are so different from each other that it
hardly seems possible that they have
a common ancestry.
(C) are so different, one from another,
that their having a common ancestor
hardly seems possible.
(D) being so different from one another
makes it hard to believe that they had
a common ancestry.
(E) that having a common ancestry hardly
seem possible in that they are so different
from one anothe
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:26 am
IMO B :

C, D E : easily eliminated

between A and B, I selected B because :

B is using same tense 'have' while A unnecessarily changing the tense.

OA Please.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:35 am
My first option was B, but each other is a bit suspicious (though it is generally used colloquially) so I went for C rather.

OA Please.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:39 am
Agree with Paes,

B should be the answer.

All dogs still have a common ancestry. Ancestry doesn't change over the period of time. 'had' in the original sentence suggests that dogs had a common ancestry but not any more. That's not the intended meaning. So 'had' is wrong in the original sentence. B correctly replaces 'had' with ''have".
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:43 am
vijay_venky wrote:My first option was B, but each other is a bit suspicious (though it is generally used colloquially) so I went for C rather.

OA Please.
In fact, "one from another" is wrong. The correct usage would have been 'different from one another'.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:28 am
GMAT Score:710

by andrey_tsi » Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:57 am
My answer is A.
B is wrong because it use "each other" instead of "one another"...
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:50 am
I believe this SC is from ARCO Master the GMAT book.

OA is A. OE says that "each other" implies that there are only two breeds of dogs, whereas "one another" implies that there are several.

When I searched, I did find couple discussions where people have said the same thing. Use "each other" only for two individuals and "one another" only for more than two. I would appreciate if one of the experts can confirm this.

I still have a problem with option A. OE doesn't mention anything about the tense ('had' is A Vs. 'have' in B). I think 'had' in the original sentence wrongly implies that dogs had a common ancestry but not anymore. And that's why we need 'have' not 'had'. Am I correct?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 1:05 am
Thanked: 11 times

by jube » Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:39 am
hardik.jadeja wrote:I believe this SC is from ARCO Master the GMAT book.

OA is A. OE says that "each other" implies that there are only two breeds of dogs, whereas "one another" implies that there are several.

When I searched, I did find couple discussions where people have said the same thing. Use "each other" only for two individuals and "one another" only for more than two. I would appreciate if one of the experts can confirm this.

I still have a problem with option A. OE doesn't mention anything about the tense ('had' is A Vs. 'have' in B). I think 'had' in the original sentence wrongly implies that dogs had a common ancestry but not anymore. And that's why we need 'have' not 'had'. Am I correct?
Was thinking the same thing that hardik.jadeja mentioned in the last para. Can Ron or one of the experts weigh in on this one? Would be super if someone could help out with the difference between "one another" and "each other" as well.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:46 am
Thanked: 2 times

by martin.jonson007 » Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:38 am
Each other OR One another is debatable

BUT

HAVE BEEN is undisputably RIGHT tesnse here b'cos

ancestry is still there...

IMO B
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:46 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Although all dogs are descended from the
wolf and the jackal, the various breeds of
dog are so different from one another that
it hardly seems possible that they had a
common ancestry.

(A) are so different from one another that
it hardly seems possible that they had
a common ancestry.
(B) are so different from each other that it
hardly seems possible that they have
a common ancestry.
(C) are so different, one from another,
that their having a common ancestor
hardly seems possible.
(D) being so different from one another
makes it hard to believe that they had
a common ancestry.
(E) that having a common ancestry hardly
seem possible in that they are so different
from one anothe
Two things:

1. We need "one another" as we are talking about various breeds..not just two.
2. Dog's having common ancestry is a phenomenon that happened in the past. We can say that dogs are descended from / descendant of a common species. But it is logically as well as grammatically unacceptable to say that dogs have common ancestor. The ancestor is not alive anymore.......
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1