BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number Properties: Divisibility & Primes

Expert replies
by miproyecto » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:34 am
This is a problem from Manhattan Number Properties Book, pg. 117:

What is the value of integer x?
1. x has exactly 2 factors
2. When x is divided by 2, the remainder is 0.

My answer was E, but according to the book, C is right.

I chose E, since from Statement 1 and 2 I can only infer that the answer could be integer 2 or -2, but I do not know how it can be concluded that the answer is only prime number 2.

What am I missing here?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by apoorva.srivastva » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:56 am
miproyecto wrote:This is a problem from Manhattan Number Properties Book, pg. 117:


1. x has exactly 2 factors


St. 1 says that x is a prime number anf prime numbers are non negative!!

so C is the correct answer as x=2 from st1 and st2 combined
Join the discussion

by miproyecto » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:02 am
Sorry to inquire again, but how many factors does -2 then have?
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:12 am
but y do u need factors of (-2) ...st1 says that x has just two factors and prime numbers are the ones who have exactly two factors i.e integer "1" and "the number itself"

from st1 ..x can be any prime number 2,3,5,7,91 etc.

from st.2 we get that x mod 2 =0

from st1 and st2

2 is the only prime number that satisfies both statements

HTH
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:15 am
and (-2) as per my understanding can have 4 factors..... -1,1,-2,2

i am not too sure though!!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:55 am
It's a badly worded question. If this were a real GMAT question, it would say "What is the value of positive integer x?", and Statement 1 would say "x has exactly two positive factors." You won't need to worry about the factors of -2 on a real GMAT question (though -2 does have four factors, -2, -1, 1 and 2), nor will you need to worry about the negative factors of 2 (2 has two negative factors, -1 and -2).

If the word 'positive' is left out, the question in the original post doesn't make sense, mathematically. The only numbers with precisely two factors are 1 and -1 (both have the factors 1 and -1) if we permit negative factors. This contradicts Statement 2. Some prep books claim that 'factor' means 'positive divisor', which simply isn't true in mathematics, but at least on the GMAT, it doesn't matter, since you will never see a question dealing with negative factors.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by miproyecto » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:06 am
Hi Ian,

In the Manhattan Book, they do omit the word positive. For that reason I was not fully sure the answer was C. But thank you for the explanation, it did help.

:)
Join the discussion