BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Why A equation + B equation doesn't wok in this case?

Expert replies
by torofish » Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:40 am
It's from CAT

x<20, Yes or No
1.) X+Y<20
2.) Y<20

I get that 1 and 2 are not sufficient.
For 1+2) I did like this

X+Y<20 [minus]
Y<20
X < 0 Therefore X < 20

But think again, it's not always the case for example
Y = -5 then X < 25

Therefore it's E.

But why two equations operations doesn't work in this case?
I thought we can do like
X+Y = 20
Y = 15
X = 5

or we can only do with equality only?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by rockeyb » Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:15 am
torofish wrote:It's from CAT

x<20, Yes or No
1.) X+Y<20
2.) Y<20

I get that 1 and 2 are not sufficient.
For 1+2) I did like this

X+Y<20 [minus]
Y<20
X < 0 Therefore X < 20

But think again, it's not always the case for example
Y = -5 then X < 25

Therefore it's E.

But why two equations operations doesn't work in this case?
I thought we can do like
X+Y = 20
Y = 15
X = 5

or we can only do with equality only?

I dont think you can even get x< 0 in the above question .
X+Y<20 [minus]
Y<20
X < 0 Therefore X < 20
This is not correct since Y is always less than 20 .


Lets look at the question .

x<20, Yes or No?

1.) X+Y<20

2.) Y<20


Rephrase (1) : X + Y < 20

X < 20 - Y

Don't know any thing about Y . Not Sufficient

Rephrase (2) : Y < 20 .

says nothing about X . Not sufficient .

Combine 1 and 2 .

Y < 20 .

And X < 20 - Y .

Now you can get an answer . And the only case when X will be less than 0 will result when Y = 20 and this can not happen since Y < 20 .


But if Y = -5

X < 25 . Is X<20 ,NO

And if Y = 19

X < 1 and Is X < 20, Yes .

Hence E.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by kstv » Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:25 am
x<20, Yes or No
1.) X+Y<20
2.) Y<20

2) Y < 20 cannot say anything about X Insuff.
1) Even if Y >= 0 X will be < 20
but, if Y<0 then say -1 then X < 21 but not < 20
Insuff.

IMO E.
Join the discussion

by Haldiram Bhujiawala » Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:29 am
torofish wrote:
I get that 1 and 2 are not sufficient.
For 1+2) I did like this

X+Y<20 [minus]
Y<20
X < 0 Therefore X < 20
I am not sure you will get X<0 , when you subtract the second inequality from the first. Because if you multiply both sides of an equality with -ve sign , the inequality sign changes, so the second inequality becomes - Y > -20 . And you cannot subtract two inequalities which are not of the same sign ( < or > ).
Join the discussion

by torofish » Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:14 am
hi thanks for your answer.
For this case, we can prove it by picking number.

But what I really doubt is that can we (+ | -- | * | / ) inequality equations?
I posted a picture
case 1, and 2 is for sure OK.

But in case 3, is it OK to do like that?
If no, from now on, if I see this kind of question, I'll just don't do another equation operations rather just simply pick numbers.

If yes, clearly, it cannot be done every time, for example, the question I asked.
So, the next question is what should I look for as a warning that these two inequalities are not operable.
Image
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:10 am
torofish wrote:hi thanks for your answer.
For this case, we can prove it by picking number.

But what I really doubt is that can we (+ | -- | * | / ) inequality equations?
I posted a picture
case 1, and 2 is for sure OK.

But in case 3, is it OK to do like that?
If no, from now on, if I see this kind of question, I'll just don't do another equation operations rather just simply pick numbers.

If yes, clearly, it cannot be done every time, for example, the question I asked.
So, the next question is what should I look for as a warning that these two inequalities are not operable.
Image
Hi,

there are so many times that we're not[/u] allowed to add and subtract inequalities that it's just not worth the trouble to do so. You're definitely better off using logic/common sense to reason out the answer or picking numbers.

With equations, it's safe to add/subtract them.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:21 am
torofish wrote:hi thanks for your answer.
For this case, we can prove it by picking number.

But what I really doubt is that can we (+ | -- | * | / ) inequality equations?
I posted a picture
case 1, and 2 is for sure OK.

But in case 3, is it OK to do like that?
If no, from now on, if I see this kind of question, I'll just don't do another equation operations rather just simply pick numbers.

If yes, clearly, it cannot be done every time, for example, the question I asked.
So, the next question is what should I look for as a warning that these two inequalities are not operable.
Image
Dude ,

Here is the mantra , when you see inequalities in equations only two operations are allowed .

1. Addition of variable
2. Subtraction of variable


So to answer your questions YES (3) is allowed and you can line up inequalities and add or subtract variables .

BUT

You can never - never multiply OR divide variables .

Reason : We never know what sign the variable has is it + ve or - ve .

And as far as multiplying / divining by - ve number is concerned you need to flip the inequality sign .

So : never multiply / divide variables in inequality .

You can add or subtract variables in equality .

Hope this helps
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion