Consumers

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:08 am
Jatinder wrote:Hi Stuart

Can you please specify the valid reason of eliminating B.

Thanks
There are two reasons to eliminate B.

First, the argument talks of "the law of supply and demand", already strongly implying that there is a relationship between the two.

Second, B says that there is a connection, but not what the connection is. It's consistent with B to draw the exact opposite conclusion than the author did (i.e. the restrictions could result in a decrease in the price of the fish), so B doesn't support the author's specific prediction.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:16 am
Thanked: 9 times

Re: Consumers

by El Cucu » Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:03 am
NSNguyen wrote:Consumers will be hurt by the new lower ceiling on halibut catches. Given the law of supply and demand these restrictions are likely to result in an increase in the price of the fish.

Which one of the following, if assumed, would do most to justify the claim that the price of halibut will increase?

(A) The demand for halibut will not decrease substantially after the new restrictions are imposed.
(B) There is a connection between the supply of halibut and the demand for it.
(C) The lost production of halibut will not be replaced by increased production of other fish.
(D) The demand for other fish will be affected by the new restrictions.
(E) The amount of halibut consumed represents a very small proportion of all fish consumed.
Conclusion: These restrictions will cause increased price
Premisses: Lower ceiling more halibut catches.

A) Hold
B) Too general and doesn´t answer the question
C) hold
D) Other fish is no discussed.
E) Out of scope.
Between A and C I would choose A as C talks about other fish so we will need at least 2 assumptions to prove that the price of halibut will increase.
Also A is necesary b/c if the consumers decrease substantially their consumption of halibut after the restrictions the price can´t be increased.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:23 am
I think B is a typical trick in strenthening quesion, answer which repeats evidence is wrong.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:34 pm
I would go for B as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest.