Sycamore trees and pollution

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:05 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:7 members
GMAT Score:760

Sycamore trees and pollution

by nikhilsrl » Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:43 am
Planners in City X noticed that many of the trees in the city were dying because of exposure to increased levels of air and water pollution. A study they commissioned revealed that sycamore trees actually thrive in environments with elevated levels of carbon monoxide, the main pollutant emitted by automobiles. In order to reverse the trend of dying trees, the city adopted a policy to replace all sick trees with sycamore trees.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the logic employed by the city planners?

a) In the forest, oak trees live an average of 70 years while sycamore trees only live for an average of 50 years.
b) Automobile manufacturers are developing newer car models that emit significantly fewer pollutants.
c) A survey by Urban Forests found that the sycamore is the most common tree in American cities.
d) The city recently installed low exhaust buses for its public transportation system.
e) Sycamore trees are extremely sensitive to sulfur dioxide, the main component of acid rain.

[spoiler]OA is E, but why not C. Infact the stimulus never mentions anything about acid rain so isn't E out of scope.[/spoiler]
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:55 am
nikhilsrl wrote:Planners in City X noticed that many of the trees in the city were dying because of exposure to increased levels of air and water pollution. A study they commissioned revealed that sycamore trees actually thrive in environments with elevated levels of carbon monoxide, the main pollutant emitted by automobiles. In order to reverse the trend of dying trees, the city adopted a policy to replace all sick trees with sycamore trees.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the logic employed by the city planners?

a) In the forest, oak trees live an average of 70 years while sycamore trees only live for an average of 50 years.
b) Automobile manufacturers are developing newer car models that emit significantly fewer pollutants.
c) A survey by Urban Forests found that the sycamore is the most common tree in American cities.
d) The city recently installed low exhaust buses for its public transportation system.
e) Sycamore trees are extremely sensitive to sulfur dioxide, the main component of acid rain.

[spoiler]OA is E, but why not C. Infact the stimulus never mentions anything about acid rain so isn't E out of scope.[/spoiler]
Only E seems to be the choice which actually weakens the conclusion

Conclusion:-to reverse the trend of dying trees, the city adopted a policy to replace all sick trees with sycamore trees.
premise1:- many of the trees in the city were dying because of exposure to increased levels of air and water pollution.
premise2:- sycamore trees actually thrive in environments with elevated levels of carbon monoxide, the main pollutant emitted by automobiles.

Your Doubt about E is valid that stimulus never mentioned acid rain, thats why, this question requires a prior knowledge about acid rain, that acid rain happens only because of air pollution...and since in the complete argument, air pollution is the main issue, choice E clearly weakens the conclusion. choice doesn't weaken the conclusion

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:56 am
I also picked C at first place.

Below is the link with expert comments : -

https://www.beatthegmat.com/kaplan-cr-qu ... 46835.html

Hope that helps .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:01 am
AIM GMAT wrote:I also picked C at first place.

Below is the link with expert comments : -

https://www.beatthegmat.com/kaplan-cr-qu ... 46835.html

Hope that helps .
Testluv
GMAT Instructor

Default Avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 1213

Thanks given: 14
Thanked 336 times in 272 posts
Location: Toronto

GMAT Score: 800




PostTue Oct 20, 2009 3:33 am Thank this user for their post
The first sentence tells us that "many of the trees in the city were dying because of exposure to increased levels of air and water pollution."

Notice that this is pretty general. We don't know what in the air or water is hurting the trees. Fine, carbon monoxide is good for these trees. But if the problem in the air or water pollution is something that cannot be remedied by elevated levels of carbon monoxide, then the plan will fail (b/c it would have failed to target the cause of the problem). In other words, the plan assume that the beneficial agent (carbon monoxide) will target the cause of the problem.

E is a fact which, if true, suggests that the cause of the problem (sulfur dioxide) is something that the elevated carbon monoxide will fail to remedy. Thus, we should now find it less believable that the plan will work.


Instead of weakening "the logic of the plan", choices b and d are facts which suggest the plan may not work as well as they thought it would had their logic been correct.
Testluv assumes that Sulphur dioxide is component of the pollution
Alo we dont know whether the other trees were also affected by Sulphur dioxide or not
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:05 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:7 members
GMAT Score:760

by nikhilsrl » Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:18 am
I chose C because to me it is saying that the trees already in place are Sycamore trees and they are sick. So planting more Sycamore trees because CO is good for them will not help.

I have raised this question in the other post.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:39 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by gmat7202011 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:35 am
A point against Option C :- Does the para mention that the problem is in American cities ?