Manhattan test 3 - DS doubt

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:38 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Manhattan test 3 - DS doubt

by shivani.magan » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:30 am
Is the product st negative?

(1) s2 - s < 0
(2) s-4/t-3 = 1


A.Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B.Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C.Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D.EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E.Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
Thanked: 52 times
Followed by:5 members

by killer1387 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:40 am
shivani.magan wrote:Is the product st negative?

(1) s2 - s < 0
(2) s-4/t-3 = 1
1. 0<s<1, insuff
2. s=t+1 (assuming the written relation is (s-4)/(t-3), do use brackets to remove ambiguity)
insuff.
1 & 2
-1<t<0
hence sufficienct

thus C

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:41 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by nakul.maheshwari » Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:11 pm
Wait a minute..is it (s-4)/(t-3) = 1 or s-(4/t)-3 = 1;

If it is (s-4)/(t-3), shouldnt the answer be B?

s-4 = t - 3
s-t = 1

If s = +ve, then t = +ve
If s = -ve, then t = -ve
S and t cannot have opposite values, hence s.t is never negative.

Answer B? what am i missing here?

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:41 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by nakul.maheshwari » Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:20 pm
Never mind, just realized that 't' can be "0" also

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:49 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 6 times

by ranjeet75 » Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:08 am
I think E should be the answer.

Stat 1: S(s - 1) < 0
so, either s < 0 or s < 1

Insuff as we don't know abt t

Stst 2: s - 4 = t - 3

s = 1+t but s and t both can be either +ve or -ve.

Both: s = 0.9 so, t = - 0.1, so st = -ve
s = 4 so, t = 3, st = +ve

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:38 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by shivani.magan » Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:25 am
ranjeet75 wrote:I think E should be the answer.

Stat 1: S(s - 1) < 0
so, either s < 0 or s < 1

Insuff as we don't know abt t

Stst 2: s - 4 = t - 3

s = 1+t but s and t both can be either +ve or -ve.

Both: s = 0.9 so, t = - 0.1, so st = -ve
s = 4 so, t = 3, st = +ve
but s cannot be 4 because s<0 or s<1
however s can be negative . if s - -2 then since s= t+1 t = -1 and st becomes positive. what i am doing wron here?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:38 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by shivani.magan » Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:26 am
killer1387 wrote:
shivani.magan wrote:Is the product st negative?

(1) s2 - s < 0
(2) s-4/t-3 = 1
1. 0<s<1, insuff
2. s=t+1 (assuming the written relation is (s-4)/(t-3), do use brackets to remove ambiguity)
insuff.
1 & 2
-1<t<0
hence sufficienct

thus C

Can u see above and tell me what am i doing wrong here?

Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
Thanked: 52 times
Followed by:5 members

by killer1387 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:05 am
shivani.magan wrote: but s cannot be 4 because s<0 or s<1
however s can be negative . if s - -2 then since s= t+1 t = -1 and st becomes positive. what i am doing wron here?
Is the product st negative?

(1) s2 - s < 0
(2) s-4/t-3 = 1

The part in bold is wrong
from
(1)s2 - s < 0
0<s<1
so s is positive.--> insufficient

(2) s=t+1
insufficient
from 1 & 2

s is positive
and
0<t+1<1
i.e. -1<t<0
i.e. t is negative

hence st is negative
sufficient.
so C

Hope this clarifies.

Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
Thanked: 52 times
Followed by:5 members

by killer1387 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:11 am
nakul.maheshwari wrote:Wait a minute..is it (s-4)/(t-3) = 1 or s-(4/t)-3 = 1;

If it is (s-4)/(t-3), shouldnt the answer be B?

s-4 = t - 3
s-t = 1

If s = +ve, then t = +ve
If s = -ve, then t = -ve
S and t cannot have opposite values, hence s.t is never negative.

Answer B? what am i missing here?
the part in bold is wrong.
(2)
t=s-1
If s = +ve, then t = can be both +ve and -ve
i.e. for 0<s<1 => t<0
for 1<s<infinity => t>0
so insufficient

HTH

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 4:23 pm

by teal » Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:10 am
Stat 2 says s = t+1; There are three possibilities a) one of them can be zero and the other either positive or negative; b) both can positive c) both can be negative

In either of these three cases product st will be either positive or zero so the answer will be NO

Wouldn't that mean B as the answer? Can someone please give me a case when product st will be negative given the conditions of statement (2).