First off - thanks a lot Mitch for replying to this post. i really appreciate it.
The Federal Reserve announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter and that the policy makers remain concerned about the prospects of inflation, even though there are few signs of higher energy prices driving up the cost of other goods so far.
A. that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter and that the policy makers remain concerned about the prospects of inflation, even though there are few
B. growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter and that the policy makers remain concerned about the prospects of inflation, even though there are few
C. that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter and the policy makers remain concerned about the prospects of inflation, even though there are few
D. growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter and the policy makers remain concerned about the prospects of inflation, even though there are few
E. that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter and that the policy makers remain concerned about the prospects of inflation, even though there are few
Secondly, if i make both things parallel. then it would be something like this...
Federal Reserve announcement said .... that growth had accelerated
....and that the policy makers remain concerned.....
both doesnt seem to be parallel.
(I) Policy makers concerned behavior is a fall out of the financial swing (slowing and accelerating)
*** I want to ask you a question- do you mean to say that unless both actions are parallel we couldn't have used a "had" before accelerated???
(II) the growth had accelerated....and policy makers remain concerned... (isn't a good construction whether they are parallelly said or said as a fallout to a statement)
why?? because the growth had accelerated after slowing down... isn't this a good news?? ..... the policy makers are still concerned....so there has to be a contradiction.
consider this sentence.
" it was raining and i was unhappy.... i wont call it a good construction.
i'd rather write.
"it was raining but i was unhappy" or although it was raining, i was unhappy because.....
i want to show some contradiction.
Hence i feel "that" should be omitted and the sentence doesn't seem correct to me.
finally, according to MGMAT "that" after say/said should be avoided. hence D should be a better option.
consider this--
consider this sentences.
Fred said that he wanted to eat.
Fred said he wanted to eat.
The second sentence is correct and crisp. why would i use "that" then?