BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000CR question2

Expert replies
by saurabhmahajan » Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:24 am
Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer's productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:40 am
imo E
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:03 pm
Only C and E seem to be the contender here. I will go with E as well.
C says "Manufacturers will decrease investment.." but that is not mentioned in the argument. Argument only says that patent laws would encourage Manufacturers. C is trying to extrapolate this logic.
OA ?
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:52 am
saurabhmahajan wrote:Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer's productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers
IMO C.

E is a case of extreme inference. How can we say "many manufacturer ". Argument is just saying that stronger laws can increase a manufacturer's productivity....this is just a generalization.

Whereas C is just a mirror image of the argument.
Manufacturer will not decrease the investment------> stronger patent laws.
Manufacturer would be encouraged to invest-----stronger patent laws.
Join the discussion

by kenfrapin » Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:07 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
E is a case of extreme inference. How can we say "many manufacturer ". Argument is just saying that stronger laws can increase a manufacturer's productivity....this is just a generalization.
That's the grammatically correct way of framing the sentence. Plus, read the 2nd sentence again - With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. The plural form is used here.

C is not right - There is no mention of decrease but only increased investments. So if there are no stronger patent laws, investment may also remain constant - or as it is today. There is no mention it will be lower than what it is today and we cannot assume that there is going to be a decrease

So what's the right OA?

KP
Join the discussion