BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

State Assembly failed

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

State Assembly failed

by sameerballani » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:00 am
Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:03 am
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
I would go with B because I feel in A "it" is ambiguous and can refer back to budget also.......whats the OA????
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:13 am
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
Hi,
'it' cannot refer to the individuals of the assembly. It can refer to the assembly as a whole. So, we need to precisely say Assemblymen.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:18 am
BUT assembly by itself is a collective noun, and IT can refer to assembly.

Eg: The assembly met at 8am in the morning. It called off at 12 noon.
Is this wrong?
Frankenstein wrote:
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
Hi,
'it' cannot refer to the individuals of the assembly. It can refer to the assembly as a whole. So, we need to precisely say Assemblymen.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 91 times
Followed by:46 members

by EducationAisle » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:23 am
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on
Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know the source?
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:28 am
What you feel about aspirant's comment above?

that it can refer to both assembly and budget, and thus it is ambiguous.
EducationAisle wrote:
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on
Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know the source?
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:30 am
sameerballani wrote:BUT assembly by itself is a collective noun, and IT can refer to assembly.

Eg: The assembly met at 8am in the morning. It called off at 12 noon.
Is this wrong?
Frankenstein wrote:
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
Hi,
'it' cannot refer to the individuals of the assembly. It can refer to the assembly as a whole. So, we need to precisely say Assemblymen.
Hi,
Assembly when talked of as a whole is singular.
Meaning is important in this case:
Let's say, in a team meeting few players in the team said 'choose batting if we win toss' and others said ' choose fielding if we win toss'. It is not that the team as a whole disagreed. It is the members who did not agree with one another.
The team as a whole disagreed means the team's collective decision is not to agree with someone else.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:34 am
I feel that when we say it could not agree ON something. We simply say that assembly as a whole was not able to come to consensus regarding something. and this perfectly goes with the meaning.
Are you sure that IT will refer to only assembly and cannot refer to budget? DO u feel IT has clear antecedent?
Frankenstein wrote:
sameerballani wrote:BUT assembly by itself is a collective noun, and IT can refer to assembly.

Eg: The assembly met at 8am in the morning. It called off at 12 noon.
Is this wrong?
Frankenstein wrote:
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
Hi,
'it' cannot refer to the individuals of the assembly. It can refer to the assembly as a whole. So, we need to precisely say Assemblymen.
Hi,
Assembly when talked of as a whole is singular.
Meaning is important in this case:
Let's say, in a team meeting few players in the team said 'choose batting if we win toss' and others said ' choose fielding if we win toss'. It is not that the team as a whole disagreed. It is the members who did not agree with one another.
The team as a whole disagreed means the team's collective decision is not to agree with someone else.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:50 am
sameerballani wrote:I feel that when we say it could not agree ON something. We simply say that assembly as a whole was not able to come to consensus regarding something. and this perfectly goes with the meaning.
Are you sure that IT will refer to only assembly and cannot refer to budget? DO u feel IT has clear antecedent?

Hi,
Pronoun ambiguity is the last thing to be checked. If you go with the meaning 'budget' could not agree doesn't make sense. So, only logical antecedent of 'it' is Assembly.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:57 am
Hi,
Actually out of two options present here, only option B was present in the question and is OA.
Similar to this option A, there was another option: it could not agree about. This was wrong because of wrong idiom.

I made up this option A to test/clarify my learning/doubt.

Thanks
EducationAisle wrote:
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on
Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know the source?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat25 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:22 am
sameerballani wrote:Last year, the State Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget because they could not agree on certain key provisions.

A)it could not agree on
B)the Assemblymen could not agree on

[spoiler]OA: Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss each choice.

Thanks
Hi, nice question.

Pronoun ambiguity is not at all an issue here. Pronoun ambiguity comes in only when two logically possible antecedents are present. for ex: Source:- some grammer book

Rajiv told his friend that HE had won the election.

here, HE is ambiguous. But in the original question, logically only assembly can be only possible antecedent hence no pronoun ambiguity is there. However, the question is purely based on meaning clarity. The error is subtle and that's why this problem is very tricky. In "State Assembly" there are two set of people..one who agreed to the key points and other who do not. As we are talking about that whole agreement thing i think we should address the individuals that is the assemblymen.

By the way, wat's the source??? is it an official question???
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1