BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Algebra

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:53 am
While I understand the explanation why aren't in this solution we considering the possibility of the values of x and y to be fractions?

In that case wont the answer differ?
Attachments
Algeb.jpg
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Uva@90 » Tue Nov 12, 2013 7:43 am
[email protected] wrote:While I understand the explanation why aren't in this solution we considering the possibility of the values of x and y to be fractions?

In that case wont the answer differ?
Shibsriz,
Thanks for posting the NICE Question.

I could not understand, what makes you to think FRACTION affect the SIGN of number.
Fraction does not affect the sign.
For example,
SQRT(25) =5 :: SQRT(125/5) = 5
Cube-root(-64) = -4 :: Cube-root(-128/2) = -4

If you post thoughts in much clearer way it could help all.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Uva.
Known is a drop Unknown is an Ocean
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:20 pm
Hi shibsriz,

This question revolves around the inequality "<". Whether the number are fractions or integers is irrelevant; the relevant issue is whether they're POSITIVE or NEGATIVE.

Since we're not allowed to use 0, we can deduce a number of things about the "pieces" of the equation (both in the question and in the two Facts):

1) (X)^-4 = 1/(X^4) this calculation will ALWAYS be POSITIVE

2) (Z)^-2 = 1/(X^2) this calculation will ALWAYS be POSITIVE

So the real question is: Is the "cube root of Y" positive or negative?

Both Facts point out that Y will be greater than a positive value, which is why they're both Sufficient on their own.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion