Even Functions

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:59 pm

Even Functions

by damilolaamele » Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:29 pm
Please what's the most effective way to approach this kind of question?

For every integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, then p is

a) Between 2 and 10
b) Between 10 and 20
c) Between 20 and 30
d) Between 30 and 40
e) Above 40

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:31 pm
damilolaamele wrote:Please what's the most effective way to approach this kind of question?

For every integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, then p is

a) Between 2 and 10
b) Between 10 and 20
c) Between 20 and 30
d) Between 30 and 40
e) Above 40

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]
Important Concept: If k is a positive integer that's greater than 1, and if k is a factor (divisor) of N, then k is not a divisor of N+1
For example, since 7 is a factor of 350, we know that 7 is not a factor of (350+1)
Similarly, since 8 is a factor of 312, we know that 8 is not a factor of 313.

Now let's examine h(100)
h(100) = (2)(4)(6)(8)....(96)(98)(100)
Factor to get: h(100) = 2[(1)(2)(3)(4)....(48)(49)(50)]

Since 2 is in the product of h(100), we know that 2 is a factor of h(100), which means that 2 is not a factor of h(100) +1 (based on the above rule)

Similarly, since 3 is in the product of h(100), we know that 3 is a factor of h(100), which means that 3 is not a factor of h(100) +1 (based on the above rule)

Similarly, since 5 is in the product of h(100), we know that 5 is a factor of h(100), which means that 5 is not a factor of h(100) +1 (based on the above rule)

.
.
.
.
Similarly, since 47 is in the product of h(100), we know that 47 is a factor of h(100), which means that 47 is not a factor of h(100) +1 (based on the above rule)

So, we can see that none of the primes from 2 to 47 can be factors of h(100) +1, which means the smallest prime factor of h(100)+ 1 must be greater than 47.

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:55 pm
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:59 pm

by damilolaamele » Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:29 pm
Thank you so much Brent and Guru. I knew there had to be a logicc, I just couldn't figure it out. This definitely helped!