BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Interpretation

Expert replies
by NSNguyen » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:47 pm
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.
M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(C) Mr. Janeck believes that political leadership and business leadership are closely analogous.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Anon » Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:55 pm
A by POE
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 1:05 am
I believe the correct answer should be A.
Join the discussion