BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

1000 CR........

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:00 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 3 times
by smclean23 » Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:32 pm
“If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.
“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.
Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?
(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.



OA is B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:57 amFollowed by: 1 member
GMAT Score:720

by bleacherseat » Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
To me B and E are both likely candiates.

E is a milder version of B. I would have gone with E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by Jatinder » Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:15 am
IMO D

Consistent with biologist but not with politician as we have not stopped deforestation.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:54 am
bleacherseat wrote:To me B and E are both likely candiates.

E is a milder version of B. I would have gone with E.
I will go with B

E is wrong bcoz
Qn says "So all that is needed" hence we do not need mild answer choice
mild actually will go against "all that"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:44 am

by nishanttheone » Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:47 pm
Biologist: Deforestation continues, Koala will approach extinction.
Politician: Deforestation is stopped, Koala doesnt become extinct.

A: Parallel to Biologist's claim, but doesnt necessarily oppose Politician's claim.
B: Not consistent with Biologist's claim.
C: Reforestation - not mentioned by Biologist. Ruled out.
D: Supports Biologist's claim, and clashes with Politician's claim of stopping deforestation (contrary to slow it down).
E: Not consistent with Biologist's claim.

IMO - D
Plz explain OA - B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:03 am
1st lets talk about the politician's argument - it's a little easier to work with.

The Politician states that: So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation

OR

If Deforestation is stopped, Koala survives

Statement B says ''If Deforestation is stopped, the Koala becomes extinct''. Hence, statement B refutes the politician's argument.

Note: Choice E - Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction - politician's argument does not concern with a reduced deforestation rate and its impact on Koala's. The politician simply means that if deforestation is stopped, Koala's would survive.


Moving on to the Biologist's argument: If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction

OR

If the current rate of deforestation is maintained, Koala's will approach extinction.

OR

If the rate of deforestation is reduced, the rate at which Koala's approach extinction will also reduce (but still approach extinction - E).

OR
Unless reforestation begins, Koala's population won't start increasing and until then its in danger of extinction.

OR

Even if deforestation is stopped, the Koala is approaching extinction and eventually becomes extinct.


Note: Choice D - Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives - would refute the biologist's argument.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pmFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 37 times

by navami » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:25 am
B :) Well explained by Expert in https://www.beatthegmat.com/cr-1000-t3251.html
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1