Why not E?

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 3:19 pm
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:710

Why not E?

by massi2884 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:42 am
[spoiler]Can you explain why do we have to assign 2 possible offices to 3 employees (2*2*2=8) like in OA D and not 3 possible employees to 2 offices (3*3=9) like in wrong answer E? Thanks.[/spoiler]

A certain company assigns employees to offices in such a way that some of the offices can be empty and more than one employee can be assigned to an office. In how many ways can the company assign 3 employees to 2 different offices?

A) 5
B) 6
C) 7
D) 8
E) 9

[spoiler]Can you explain why do we have to assign 2 possible offices to 3 employees (2*2*2=8) like in OA D and not 3 possible employees to 2 offices (3*3=9) like in wrong answer E? Thanks.[/spoiler]
Source: — Problem Solving |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

by shantanu86 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:00 am
IMO its D(8) and not 9. Here is the reasoning-
---------------------------------
Off-1 Off-2 Combinations
---------------------------------
3 0 1
2 1 3C1 = 3 (Choose 1 employee in 3 to occupy Off-2)
1 2 3C2 = 3
0 3 1
0 0 0 , this is invalid as all employees must be assigned an office.
---------------------------------

Therefore, total number of combinations is 8.

Hope it helps!!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:14 am
massi2884 wrote:[spoiler]Can you explain why do we have to assign 2 possible offices to 3 employees (2*2*2=8) like in OA D and not 3 possible employees to 2 offices (3*3=9) like in wrong answer E? Thanks.[/spoiler]

A certain company assigns employees to offices in such a way that some of the offices can be empty and more than one employee can be assigned to an office. In how many ways can the company assign 3 employees to 2 different offices?

A) 5
B) 6
C) 7
D) 8
E) 9

[spoiler]Can you explain why do we have to assign 2 possible offices to 3 employees (2*2*2=8) like in OA D and not 3 possible employees to 2 offices (3*3=9) like in wrong answer E? Thanks.[/spoiler]
Each of three employee can be assigned to either of offices, meaning that each has 2 choices implies # of ways the company can assign 3 employees to 2 different offices = 2 * 2 * 2 = 2^3 = 8

The correct answer is D.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

by [email protected] » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:42 pm
IMO its D(8) and not 9. Here is the reasoning-
---------------------------------
Off-1 Off-2 Combinations
---------------------------------
3 0 1
2 1 3C1 = 3 (Choose 1 employee in 3 to occupy Off-2)
1 2 3C2 = 3
0 3 1
0 0 0 , this is invalid as all employees must be assigned an office.
---------------------------------

Therefore, total number of combinations is 8.

A wonderful reasoning given...

I almost got the 4 options listed but could not somehow use the combinations formula for the 3 employees. So initially I got the answer as 4 which is not in the list...

Yes this is the correct method as it also gives you the overall picture. I liked it...

{a bit weak in probability}
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:10 members

by ronnie1985 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:10 am
The question should have explicitly stated that both the offices must not be vacant.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:57 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

by shantanu86 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:23 pm
ronnie1985 wrote:The question should have explicitly stated that both the offices must not be vacant.
Hi ronnie1985,

"In how many ways can the company assign 3 employees to 2 different offices? "

IMHO above lines clearly state that every employee must be assigned to one of the offices under the constrains set.

To cross check-
If it was allowed to not assign some/all of employees, the number of arrangements will become much more than 9, the max option in list.

Hope it helps!!
If you feel like it, hit thanks :)