Tough One...Any Takers?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:03 pm
I bet on option a
even by quick scan of answers it's clear the answer should be -ve

S(1)=-1/2, S(2)=1/6
S(3)=-1/12, S(4)=1/20

in total 5 such pairs which should return -ve value, as each successive element of the set is less than the preceding one (-ve value).
Success doesn't come overnight!

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:59 pm
There's no such pattern here to generalize, so list out the first few number.
Some general observations
- signs alternate
- magnitude gets smaller as n increases.

S1 = -1/2 = -0.5
S2 = 1/6 = 0.166
S3 = -1/12 = -0.083
S4 = 1/20 = 0.05

Now stop here, isolate S1, we notice (S2+S3+S4) is +ve and when added with S1 would result in a number slightly greater than -0.5 (-0.5 - 0). Only option B is in that range.

PS: Same pattern would follow until S10, isolating S1 we have 5 +ve numbers and 4 -ve with S2 being the highest magnitude, (S2+S3+----+S10) would be +ve, so S1(-0.5)+ (+ve number) would result in number > -0.5

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:27 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Thanked: 17 times

by [email protected] » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:16 pm
We can sum the series upto S10 as:
-1/2 +(1/6-1/12) + (1/20-1/30) + (1/42-1/56) + (1/72-1/90) + 1/110
=-1/2 + (1/12)+ (1/60) + (1/168) + (1/360)+ 1/110
=-1/2 + (+ve fraction)

So definitely Sum of first 10 member of this series would be slightly > -1/2
Hence the best answer choice would be B.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:10 members

by ronnie1985 » Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:50 pm
The question is not appearing in full... please post the full question...
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:04 am
damned it, i could not read the sign negative 1/2 and 0 in answer choice B and decided right away about the only negative in a)
it's b if one tests the sum of resultants

:evil:
pemdas wrote:I bet on option a
even by quick scan of answers it's clear the answer should be -ve

S(1)=-1/2, S(2)=1/6
S(3)=-1/12, S(4)=1/20

in total 5 such pairs which should return -ve value, as each successive element of the set is less than the preceding one (-ve value).
Success doesn't come overnight!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:02 am
Calculate just enough to see the pattern.

If n=1, (-1)¹ * 1/(1*2) = -1/2.
If n=2, (-1)² * 1/(2*3) = 1/6
If n=3, (-1)³ * 1/(3*4) = -1/12.
If n=4, (-1)� * 1/(4*5) = 1/20.

Plot the results on a number line:
Image

The sum of the first two terms = -1/2 + 1/6 = -1/3.
From this point on, the sum alternates between decreasing by a very small fraction and increasing by an even smaller fraction.
Thus, the sum will end up somewhere between -1/2 (the first term) and -1/3 (the sum of the first two terms).

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3