Standard of living

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:43 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Standard of living

by pareekbharat86 » Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:35 pm
Brunhilda: Economists have predicted that our generation will be the first that cannot confidently look forward to having a better standard of living than that enjoyed by our parents.

Siegfried: That's simply untrue. My father's standard of living is nowhere near as high as his parents' was, and my own standard of living is already higher than that of my parents.

Which of the following best describes the error of reasoning contained in Siegfried's argument above?

a. It relies upon an unreasonable appeal to authority.
b. It assumes the truth of what it sets out to prove.
c. It offers an example that is not inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument.
d. It is based on an unproven speculation about future events.
e. It uses evidence of a correlation to argue the existence of a causal relationship.

OA later.
Thanks,
Bharat.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:34 am

by theunheardmelody » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:41 am
IMO C using POE.

I chose the above option because it is in direct conflict to what it stated in the arguement.


Let us know the OA :)[/spoiler]