BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

tense

Expert replies
by GMAT Kolaveri » Sun May 06, 2012 8:37 am
His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.

(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate

OA: B

But i prefer D. I think had is necessary. but B does not "had"
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by vk_vinayak » Sun May 06, 2012 8:53 am
It's a contest between A and B.

A is clearly wrong because between now and currently, only one is needed.

Also, had is not necessary here. Had is used only when we want to showcase the sequence of events. In the current sentence, the sequence is very clear, hence no need of 'had'.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun May 06, 2012 10:57 am
His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.

(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun May 06, 2012 1:00 pm
vk_vinayak wrote: Also, had is not necessary here. Had is used only when we want to showcase the sequence of events. In the current sentence, the sequence is very clear, hence no need of 'had'.
Exactly. If the events are unrelated, we do not need past perfect.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1