CR

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:59 am

CR

by amitu » Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:06 am
A study of marital relationships in which one partner's sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the
other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments
than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus,
mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also occasionally
have arguments than can jeopardize the couple's marriage.
(B) The sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season.
(C) The individuals who have sleeping and waking cycles that differ significantly from those of their spouses
tend to argue little with colleagues at work.
(D) People in unhappy marriages have been found to express hostility by adopting a different sleeping and
waking cycle from that of their spouses.
(E) According to a recent study, most people's sleeping and waking cycles can be controlled and modified
easily.


Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government
insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high
rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that
holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be
secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?
(A) Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank
failure than there is now.
(B) When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors'
fears of losing money in bank failures.
(C) Surveys show that a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the
government.
(D) There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the government will insure, but very few
individuals' deposits exceed thislimit.
(E) The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also
on how much risk its loans involve.

few tougher CR , do we get answer by attacking the conclusion directly ? hw imp is a conclusion in weakening CR's
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:15 am

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:44 am
For the first question, the answer must be D.

The argument shows different sleeping and waking cycle as the cause for seriously jeopardizing a marriage. Option D rejects this claim and says that because the marriage is already in jeopardy, the couples change their sleeping and waking cycle in order to avoid each other.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:53 am
gmatmachoman wrote:https://www.beatthegmat.com/bank-deposit ... 21354.html
Plz hit search button before u post !
gmatmachoman, I think you didnt notice that the question posted here and the question in the link you provided are different.

Anyways, the answer for the second question has to be B.

Economist says that the government should not insure the deposits. Option B rejects the reasoning given by the economist and says that when the government didn't insure the deposit, even though people might have been choosy in selecting the bank, the bank failures were more frequent than it is today.

Hope that helps..

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:39 am
a.initially i though this might be correct. then eliminated because "occassionaly"
b.seasonality is not important
c.argument with colleagues is out of scope
d.correct
e. says nothing abt sleeping cycle
amitu wrote:A study of marital relationships in which one partner's sleeping and waking cycles differ from those of the
other partner reveals that such couples share fewer activities with each other and have more violent arguments
than do couples in a relationship in which both partners follow the same sleeping and waking patterns. Thus,
mismatched sleeping and waking cycles can seriously jeopardize a marriage.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Married couples in which both spouses follow the same sleeping and waking patterns also occasionally
have arguments than can jeopardize the couple's marriage.
(B) The sleeping and waking cycles of individuals tend to vary from season to season.
(C) The individuals who have sleeping and waking cycles that differ significantly from those of their spouses
tend to argue little with colleagues at work.
(D) People in unhappy marriages have been found to express hostility by adopting a different sleeping and
waking cycle from that of their spouses.
(E) According to a recent study, most people's sleeping and waking cycles can be controlled and modified
easily.

few tougher CR , do we get answer by attacking the conclusion directly ? hw imp is a conclusion in weakening CR's
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:48 am
a. strengthens the arg
b. correct
c. out of scope. no relation is shown on how govt insurance makes depositors less selective abt banks
d. out of scope. upper limit on deposit is irrelevant
e. no relation is shown on how govt insurance makes depositors less selective abt banks
amitu wrote: Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government
insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high
rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that
holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be
secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?
(A) Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank
failure than there is now.
(B) When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors'
fears of losing money in bank failures.
(C) Surveys show that a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the
government.
(D) There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the government will insure, but very few
individuals' deposits exceed thislimit.
(E) The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also
on how much risk its loans involve.

few tougher CR , do we get answer by attacking the conclusion directly ? hw imp is a conclusion in weakening CR's
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:59 am
Thanked: 4 times

by missionGMAT007 » Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:17 am
IMO 1. D 2. B