BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Aristotle SC Bank. 20.

Expert replies
by vineeshp » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:39 pm
Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they want to be
able to compete against private firms
.

A. Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they
want to be able to compete against private firms
B. Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete
with private firms
C. Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to
compete against private firms
D. Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to
be in competition with private firms
E. Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to
compete with private firms.

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?[/spoiler]
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by smackmartine » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:02 pm
This is a nice question.

I chose B ..but after looking at the OA, the only difference I find between B and E is the casual tone(should) VS necessity(will).
...waiting for experts to comment.
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

by gmat25 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:33 pm
I think this question follows (if....then....)conditional structure.

If....(present tense)..then...(future tense)
Princeton Review CAT - 710(Q-51, V-37) --> silly mistakes screwed up my VERBAL
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:10 pm
Manhattan SC guide says
Are to is awkward and should be avoided .
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:49 am
vineeshp wrote:Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they want to be
able to compete against private firms
.

A. Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they
want to be able to compete against private firms
B. Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete
with private firms
C. Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to
compete against private firms
D. Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to
be in competition with private firms
E. Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to
compete with private firms.

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?[/spoiler]
Nopes I don't think so that there is a change in the meaning of if they are to & if they wish to...........also can u please share with me the Aristotle SC's which you have with you :-) ?
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:53 am
It would be great if you could post the Aristotle SC right here on BTG. That way anyone will be able to download and use them
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:42 am
A. Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they
want to be able to compete against private firms ( CONTENDER )
B. Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete
with private firms ( ORIGINAL QUESTION SAYS - Will be required to, this option says - "should", which means a condition, INCORRECT )
C. Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to
compete against private firms ( WOULD + if clause in present tense, INCORRECT )
D. Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to
be in competition with private firms ( have to need to - Wierd and condition - INCORRECT )
E. Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to
compete with private firms. ( CONTENDOR )

I choose E over A, because "
will need to" is better than "will be required to".
"they are to" is less wordy than "want to be able to".

Overall E is more concise and active than A.
Join the discussion

by Bek » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:15 pm
I hope this will help
Last edited by Bek on Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Join the discussion

by Bek » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:16 pm
I found original sentence in "McKinsey on Finance".

Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to compete with private firms.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:27 pm
vineeshp wrote:Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?
It's a slight change in meaning. "to be + to" encompasses desire and obligation and expectation all in one. I don't remember seeing anything in the OG about it being awkward (but that doesn't mean it doesn't say that!).
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:27 pm
Jim@Grockit wrote:
vineeshp wrote:Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?
It's a slight change in meaning. "to be + to" encompasses desire and obligation and expectation all in one. I don't remember seeing anything in the OG about it being awkward (but that doesn't mean it doesn't say that!).
is 'if they are to' to be avoided? is it really awkward? :O
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by sana.noor » Sat Feb 09, 2013 12:19 am
E is the only right answer
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1