BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Committee X and Committee Y, which have no....

Expert replies
by factor26 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:55 pm
Committee X and Committee Y, which have no
common members, will combine to form Committee Z.
Does Committee X have more members than
Committee Y ?

(1) The average (arithmetic mean) age of the
members of Committee X is 25.7 years and the
average age of the members of Committee Y is
29.3 years.

(2) The average (arithmetic mean) age of the
members of Committee Z will be 26.6 years

i'm a little stuck on this one ... i'm assuming this here is a weighted average question ... but can someone explain how we can find out whehter x or y has a greater number of members?

OG answer is c any help would be much appreciated. Thanks all!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by adichill » Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:20 pm
factor26 wrote:Committee X and Committee Y, which have no
common members, will combine to form Committee Z.
Does Committee X have more members than
Committee Y ?

(1) The average (arithmetic mean) age of the
members of Committee X is 25.7 years and the
average age of the members of Committee Y is
29.3 years.

(2) The average (arithmetic mean) age of the
members of Committee Z will be 26.6 years

i'm a little stuck on this one ... i'm assuming this here is a weighted average question ... but can someone explain how we can find out whehter x or y has a greater number of members?

OG answer is c any help would be much appreciated. Thanks all!
Avg Funda : Assume a group has 10 members and their average age is 20 years ...now if you move any members with age greater than 20 out of the group..the avg of the group will fall down. On the contrary if you remove any members of age below 20 years .. the avg will rise.
statement 1 ) ---> not sufficent as it does not give us the avg age of Z..
statement 2 ) ---> not sufficent as the avg age of X and Y are not given

combining both statements : iF you see the avg of Z..you will find that the avg is tilted more towards the avg of X...what this means is that the average is contributed by more members from X than Y and hence there are more members from X in the group Z...hence both statements are sufficent to answer the question..

Please correct me if i am wrong...i am also a novice in GMAT..:)
Join the discussion

by neelgandham » Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:23 pm
Committee X and Committee Y, which have no common members, will combine to form Committee Z. Does Committee X have more members than Committee Y ?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) age of the members of Committee X is 25.7 years and the average age of the members of Committee Y is 29.3 years.

Insufficient as it doesn't speak about the average (arithmetic mean) age of the members of Committee Z
(2) The average (arithmetic mean) age of the members of Committee Z will be 26.6 years
Insufficient as it doesn't speak about the average (arithmetic mean) ages of the members of Committee X and Y

Alright let me solve it using variables first.
Let X be the number of members in committee X and Y, the number of members in committee Y
Sum of ages of members in committee X = Average age of the members of Committee X * number of members in committee X = 25.7*X
Sum of ages of members in committee Y = Average age of the members of Committee Y * number of members in committee Y = 29.3*Y
Sum of ages of members in committee Z = Average age of the members of Committee Z * number of members in committee Z = 26.6*(X+Y)
Sum of ages of members in committee Z = Sum of ages of members in committee X + Sum of ages of members in committee Y
Implies 26.6X + 26.6Y = 25.7*X + 29.3*Y
Implies 0.9X = 2.7Y, Implies X>Y(X=3Y). Hence Sufficient!

You can also use mixture and allegations concepts as shown in the attachment.

GMAT way: The value of average age of the members of Z is closer to the value of the average age of the members of X, which implies that the members of x are greater than y in number. Hence C
Attachments
BeattheGMAT100.jpg
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Join the discussion

by factor26 » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:55 am
@ neel,

Thanks for your help ... i also solved using the GMAT way but was just a little unsure about the relationship between age and the # of individuals in each group ... well explained...Cheers!
Join the discussion