BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

comma splice vs noun modifier : big help

Expert replies
by aditya.j » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:57 pm
Wazup Gmat destroyers,

I just came across this sentence which I mistook for a comma splice sentence that is wrongly connected without a comma and conjunction.
for eg.
Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications. (note that there are actually 2 independent clauses connected with a comma)

Now considering that we got to always keep an eye open for run on sentences, how do we differentiate between a run on sentence and one that has a summative modifier??

Any help would he appreciated...

best regards,

aJ


[Moderator Edit: Moved the post to a relevant forum - neelgandham]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by neelgandham » Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:06 am
bumped to move the post to the top of the forum.
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:10 am
aditya.j wrote: Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications. (note that there are actually 2 independent clauses connected with a comma)
Actually the second one is not a clause: a demographic change that will have serious social implications

a demographic change is a phrase and the rest of the words that will have serious social implications form a dependent clause modifying this phrase.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by chris@magoosh » Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:57 am
Let's see if I can clear things up :).

First off, a comma splice occurs when two independent clauses are joined by only a comma (no accompanying FANBOYS or subordinating conjunction). In the following sentence, we have an independent clause joined to a dependent clause:

Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications.

The bolded part is an independent clause. The non-bolded part is a dependent clause. Let's take a closer look at the latter:

A demographic change that will have serious social implications is composed of a subject, the relative pronoun 'that' and the relative clause. Nowhere is there a verb that connects to 'a demographic change.'

The original sentence is clearly an example of a summative modifier. It is important to note that a summative modifier does not connect two independent clauses. A summative modifier replaces what I call "the awkward which."

A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, which has caused the government considerable consternation.

A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, an occurrence that has caused the government considerable consternation.


In replacing 'which' with a word that captures the essence of the independent clause, I do not have an independent clause. Thus summative modifiers do not serve to join together independent clauses, but, with the help of a comma, connect the main clause to a dependent clause.

Hope that helps :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1