comma splice vs noun modifier : big help

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:58 am
Thanked: 1 times

comma splice vs noun modifier : big help

by aditya.j » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:57 pm
Wazup Gmat destroyers,

I just came across this sentence which I mistook for a comma splice sentence that is wrongly connected without a comma and conjunction.
for eg.
Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications. (note that there are actually 2 independent clauses connected with a comma)

Now considering that we got to always keep an eye open for run on sentences, how do we differentiate between a run on sentence and one that has a summative modifier??

Any help would he appreciated...

best regards,

aJ


[Moderator Edit: Moved the post to a relevant forum - neelgandham]

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 am
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thanked: 318 times
Followed by:52 members

by neelgandham » Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:06 am
bumped to move the post to the top of the forum.
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 91 times
Followed by:46 members

by EducationAisle » Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:10 am
aditya.j wrote: Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications. (note that there are actually 2 independent clauses connected with a comma)
Actually the second one is not a clause: a demographic change that will have serious social implications

a demographic change is a phrase and the rest of the words that will have serious social implications form a dependent clause modifying this phrase.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:01 pm
Thanked: 54 times
Followed by:37 members

by chris@magoosh » Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:57 am
Let's see if I can clear things up :).

First off, a comma splice occurs when two independent clauses are joined by only a comma (no accompanying FANBOYS or subordinating conjunction). In the following sentence, we have an independent clause joined to a dependent clause:

Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications.

The bolded part is an independent clause. The non-bolded part is a dependent clause. Let's take a closer look at the latter:

A demographic change that will have serious social implications is composed of a subject, the relative pronoun 'that' and the relative clause. Nowhere is there a verb that connects to 'a demographic change.'

The original sentence is clearly an example of a summative modifier. It is important to note that a summative modifier does not connect two independent clauses. A summative modifier replaces what I call "the awkward which."

A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, which has caused the government considerable consternation.

A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, an occurrence that has caused the government considerable consternation.


In replacing 'which' with a word that captures the essence of the independent clause, I do not have an independent clause. Thus summative modifiers do not serve to join together independent clauses, but, with the help of a comma, connect the main clause to a dependent clause.

Hope that helps :)