Wazup Gmat destroyers,
I just came across this sentence which I mistook for a comma splice sentence that is wrongly connected without a comma and conjunction.
for eg.
Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications. (note that there are actually 2 independent clauses connected with a comma)
Now considering that we got to always keep an eye open for run on sentences, how do we differentiate between a run on sentence and one that has a summative modifier??
Any help would he appreciated...
best regards,
aJ
[Moderator Edit: Moved the post to a relevant forum - neelgandham]
comma splice vs noun modifier : big help
This topic has expert replies
- neelgandham
- Community Manager
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 am
- Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Thanked: 318 times
- Followed by:52 members
bumped to move the post to the top of the forum.
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
- EducationAisle
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 91 times
- Followed by:46 members
Actually the second one is not a clause: a demographic change that will have serious social implicationsaditya.j wrote: Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications. (note that there are actually 2 independent clauses connected with a comma)
a demographic change is a phrase and the rest of the words that will have serious social implications form a dependent clause modifying this phrase.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
- chris@magoosh
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:01 pm
- Thanked: 54 times
- Followed by:37 members
Let's see if I can clear things up .
First off, a comma splice occurs when two independent clauses are joined by only a comma (no accompanying FANBOYS or subordinating conjunction). In the following sentence, we have an independent clause joined to a dependent clause:
Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications.
The bolded part is an independent clause. The non-bolded part is a dependent clause. Let's take a closer look at the latter:
A demographic change that will have serious social implications is composed of a subject, the relative pronoun 'that' and the relative clause. Nowhere is there a verb that connects to 'a demographic change.'
The original sentence is clearly an example of a summative modifier. It is important to note that a summative modifier does not connect two independent clauses. A summative modifier replaces what I call "the awkward which."
A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, which has caused the government considerable consternation.
A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, an occurrence that has caused the government considerable consternation.
In replacing 'which' with a word that captures the essence of the independent clause, I do not have an independent clause. Thus summative modifiers do not serve to join together independent clauses, but, with the help of a comma, connect the main clause to a dependent clause.
Hope that helps
First off, a comma splice occurs when two independent clauses are joined by only a comma (no accompanying FANBOYS or subordinating conjunction). In the following sentence, we have an independent clause joined to a dependent clause:
Agricultural advances have substantially increased peruvian population growth, a demographic change that will have serious social implications.
The bolded part is an independent clause. The non-bolded part is a dependent clause. Let's take a closer look at the latter:
A demographic change that will have serious social implications is composed of a subject, the relative pronoun 'that' and the relative clause. Nowhere is there a verb that connects to 'a demographic change.'
The original sentence is clearly an example of a summative modifier. It is important to note that a summative modifier does not connect two independent clauses. A summative modifier replaces what I call "the awkward which."
A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, which has caused the government considerable consternation.
A decrease in the country's exports has hurt its GDP, an occurrence that has caused the government considerable consternation.
In replacing 'which' with a word that captures the essence of the independent clause, I do not have an independent clause. Thus summative modifiers do not serve to join together independent clauses, but, with the help of a comma, connect the main clause to a dependent clause.
Hope that helps