BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Work Problem

Expert replies
by mynewgator » Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:09 pm
Each of 10 machines works at the same constant rate doing a certain job. The amount of times needed by the 10 machines, working together, to complete the job is 16 hours. How many hours would be needed if only 8 of the machines, working together, were used to complete the job?

A. 18
B. 20
C. 22
D. 24
E. 26
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:18 pm
10 machines takes 16 hours.
1 machine will take 10 * 16 = 160 hours
8 machines will take 160/8 = 20 hours

The correct answer is [spoiler](B)[/spoiler].
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by HPengineer » Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:17 pm
Is there any other approach? would 16 divided by 10 give you the rate of each the machines is working?
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:34 pm
HPengineer wrote:Is there any other approach? would 16 divided by 10 give you the rate of each the machines is working?
This is the case of inverse variation (more will be the no. of people working, less will be the time taken), and 1 machine alone will take more time than 10 machines.

If 10 machines take 16 hours, then the same work can be done by 1 machine in more time, that is 16 * 10 = 160 hours

Does that help?
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by HPengineer » Sun Aug 08, 2010 5:46 pm
my issue is that i always start rate problems with the equation below...

R(T) = W from here is where i got messed up...

They tell us that there are 10 machines working at constant rate.. and for them together to complete 1 job it takes 16 hours...

So i create the equation R*(16) = 1 job which R = 1/16... i took this as the rate for each machine individually...

i guess i don't understand why you multiplied by 10 as the rate to 160 hours?? maybe a bit more details please?
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:20 pm
HPengineer wrote:my issue is that i always start rate problems with the equation below...

R(T) = W from here is where i got messed up...

They tell us that there are 10 machines working at constant rate.. and for them together to complete 1 job it takes 16 hours...

So i create the equation R*(16) = 1 job which R = 1/16... i took this as the rate for each machine individually...

i guess i don't understand why you multiplied by 10 as the rate to 160 hours?? maybe a bit more details please?
Here, we don't need to calculate the rate, it is constant. We need to find the time taken by 8 machines to complete the job, working at the same rate as 16 machines.
We can do this by ratio-proportion method also.

Machines : Time
10 : 16 hrs
8 : x hrs

Note: This is the case of inverse variation, as increasing the no. of workers would decrease the time taken.

So, 10/8 = x/16, which when solved gives x = 20 hours.

Does this help?
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by HPengineer » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:24 pm
Excellent... makes clear sense now... I like the idea of rates approach as well very straight forward...
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:26 pm
HPengineer wrote:Excellent... makes clear sense now... I like the idea of rates approach as well very straight forward...
Great! :-)
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by likithae » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:26 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:
HPengineer wrote:my issue is that i always start rate problems with the equation below...

R(T) = W from here is where i got messed up...

They tell us that there are 10 machines working at constant rate.. and for them together to complete 1 job it takes 16 hours...

So i create the equation R*(16) = 1 job which R = 1/16... i took this as the rate for each machine individually...

i guess i don't understand why you multiplied by 10 as the rate to 160 hours?? maybe a bit more details please?
Here, we don't need to calculate the rate, it is constant. We need to find the time taken by 8 machines to complete the job, working at the same rate as 16 machines.
We can do this by ratio-proportion method also.

Machines : Time
10 : 16 hrs
8 : x hrs

Note: This is the case of inverse variation, as increasing the no. of workers would decrease the time taken.

So, 10/8 = x/16, which when solved gives x = 20 hours.

Does this help?
your way of approach is great ............but is there any shortcut rather than this.........
Join the discussion