BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

BTG Mean Problem

Expert replies
by aleph777 » Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:22 pm
I started using the BTG practice program a couple weeks ago, and I'm getting quite a few supposedly low-level questions incorrect. In fact, I'm often not able to even figure out how to solve them. Has anyone else noticed they're generally more difficult than standard OG questions? Maybe it's the phrasing?

Anyhow, here's a problem I just saw.

If x is a prime number, and x-1 is the median of the set {x-1, 3x +3, 2x-4}, then what is the average (arithmetic mean) of the set?

1. 2
2. 5/3
3. 3
4. 10/3
5. 14/3

OA: D

Here's how I tried so solve, but it was wrong. Can someone explain why this approach is incorrect?

We know the set has 3 terms, and therefore the median is also the mean. So I set up mean equation: mean = sum of terms / number of terms:

x-1 = (x - 1 + 3x + 3 + 2x -4) / 3

3x-3 = 6x - 2
-1=3x
-1/3 = x

And therefore the mean, which is also the media x-1, must equal: -1/3 - 1 = -4/3

And that's not even an answer choice that you might typically see as a fake-out.

Why doesn't this approach work?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:59 pm
aleph777 wrote:I started using the BTG practice program a couple weeks ago, and I'm getting quite a few supposedly low-level questions incorrect. In fact, I'm often not able to even figure out how to solve them. Has anyone else noticed they're generally more difficult than standard OG questions? Maybe it's the phrasing?

Anyhow, here's a problem I just saw.

If x is a prime number, and x-1 is the median of the set {x-1, 3x +3, 2x-4}, then what is the average (arithmetic mean) of the set?

1. 2
2. 5/3
3. 3
4. 10/3
5. 14/3

OA: D

Here's how I tried so solve, but it was wrong. Can someone explain why this approach is incorrect?

We know the set has 3 terms, and therefore the median is also the mean. So I set up mean equation: mean = sum of terms / number of terms:

x-1 = (x - 1 + 3x + 3 + 2x -4) / 3

3x-3 = 6x - 2
-1=3x
-1/3 = x

And therefore the mean, which is also the media x-1, must equal: -1/3 - 1 = -4/3

And that's not even an answer choice that you might typically see as a fake-out.

Why doesn't this approach work?
Mean = median only if the numbers are symmetrical about the median, as in the following sets:

{1,2,3}. Mean = (1+2+3)/3 = 2 = median.
{3,5,7}. Mean = (3+5+7)/3 = 5 = median.
{1,6,11}. Mean = (1+6+11)/3 = 6 = median.

For the problem above, I would plug in a value for x that satisfies the conditions in the problem.

Let x=2.
x-1 = 2-1 = 1.
3x+3 = 3*2 + 3 = 9.
2x-4 = 2*2 - 4 = 0.

This works because x-1 = 1 is the median of {0, 1, 9}.

Average = (1+9+0)/3 = 10/3.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aleph777 » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:11 pm
Oh, of course! Silly mistake. They weren't consecutive....
Join the discussion

by eyelikecheese » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:34 pm
Hmm..How can the answer not be derived from the number 3

3-1=2

Therefore, 2,2,12. The average of this set is 16/3? or 5 1/3
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:59 pm
eyelikecheese wrote:Hmm..How can the answer not be derived from the number 3

3-1=2

Therefore, 2,2,12. The average of this set is 16/3? or 5 1/3
According to some, a set must contain distinct elements. The question above likely is relying on this definition; thus, {2,2,12} does not qualify as a set. Others disagree with this definition of a set. For this reason, if the question above were to appear on the GMAT, the wording would make clear that the numbers in the set were distinct.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by eyelikecheese » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:44 pm
What a horrible problem then
Join the discussion

by ontogenez » Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:33 am
there are two possible ordered sets

1. {3x+3 <= x-1 <= 2x-4} => x<=2 AND x>=3. No solution.
2. {2x-4 <= x-1 <= 3x+3} => x<=3 AND x>=-2. Only two primes - 2 and 3.

Average = (2x-4+x-1+3x+3)/3 = 2x - 2/3;

For x=2, average = 10/3
For x=3, average = 16/3

Choose D
Join the discussion

by thebigkats » Thu Feb 17, 2011 1:13 pm
HI:
We know that the set has {x - 1, 3x + 3, 2x - 4} and x is a prime no (means x = positive integer)

Mean of this set = (x-1+3x+3+2x-4)/3 = (6x-2)/3

M=(6x-2)/3 ==> x = (3M+2) / 6

Now we can easily plug in values to find which M results in x = integer value.

(A) 2
x = (3*2+2)/6 = 8/6 ------------- CAN'T BE

(B) 5/3
x = 7/6 --------------- CAN'T BE

(C) 3
x = 11/6 --------------- CAN"T BE


(D) 10/3
x = 2 -------------- POSSIBLE

(E) 14/3
x = 16/6 --------------- CAN"T BE

So we have D as answer.

Note
(A) If we had found more than one values satisfying the equation then we could have gone to the next step and see if x was a prime

(B) If more than one values were prime then we would have to check if {x-1, 3x +3, 2x-4} has median of (x-1)

Rgds,
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:07 am
aleph777 wrote:I started using the BTG practice program a couple weeks ago, and I'm getting quite a few supposedly low-level questions incorrect. In fact, I'm often not able to even figure out how to solve them. Has anyone else noticed they're generally more difficult than standard OG questions? Maybe it's the phrasing?

Anyhow, here's a problem I just saw.

If x is a prime number, and x-1 is the median of the set {x-1, 3x +3, 2x-4}, then what is the average (arithmetic mean) of the set?

1. 2
2. 5/3
3. 3
4. 10/3
5. 14/3

OA: D

Here's how I tried so solve, but it was wrong. Can someone explain why this approach is incorrect?

We know the set has 3 terms, and therefore the median is also the mean. So I set up mean equation: mean = sum of terms / number of terms:

x-1 = (x - 1 + 3x + 3 + 2x -4) / 3

3x-3 = 6x - 2
-1=3x
-1/3 = x

And therefore the mean, which is also the media x-1, must equal: -1/3 - 1 = -4/3

And that's not even an answer choice that you might typically see as a fake-out.

Why doesn't this approach work?
Choices are not in right order, not an ideal look to be a GMAT question, but it's still a good question



Two methods...

Method 1

Here we don't need the info that x - 1 is the median of the set {x - 1, 3 x + 3, 2 x - 4}, because average of the set {x - 1, 3 x + 3, 2 x - 4} is (6 x - 2)/3 or 3 times an answer choice is 6 x - 2, where x is a prime.

1. 6 x - 2 = 6 doesn't prove x a prime.
2. 6 x - 2 = 5 doesn't prove x a prime.
3. 6 x - 2 = 9 doesn't prove x a prime.
4. 6 x - 2 = 10 [spoiler]proves x = 2, a prime. SUCCESS
5. Needless, 6 x - 2 = 14 doesn't prove x a prime.

Choice 4
[/spoiler]

Method 2

If x is prime then x - 1 is positive and 3 x + 3 > 2 x - 4, and if x - 1 is the median of the set {x - 1, 3 x + 3, 2 x - 4}, then 2 x - 4 < x - 1 < 3 x + 3, with this 2 x - 4 < x - 1 gives x < 3 and x - 1 < 3 x + 3 gives x > -2, overall x is a prime such that -2 < x < 3. Nothing EXCEPT x = 2 fits here. Once x = 2, the set {x - 1, 3 x + 3, 2 x - 4} becomes {1, 9, 0} whose average is otherwise [spoiler]10/3

Choice 4
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by thebigkats » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:26 am
Hi Aleph777:

you mentioned: "We know the set has 3 terms, and therefore the median is also the mean. So I set up mean equation: mean = sum of terms / number of terms". This is NOT a true assumption. Consider {2, 3, 5} and {2, 3, 11}. Both these sets have 3 elements, median =3 and yet different mean values.

Probably this was the reason for you to get to wrong conclusion.

rgds
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:13 pm
what a quest :) x-1+3x+3+2x-4=3*answer --> x=(3*answer+2)/6. Instantly note, answer>3 for x=2 (the least prime number). Eliminate A and B. Try x=2, --> answer=10/3 and choice 4(D) is correct.

________________________
I continue pondering about CAT GMAT on the 17th ...

aleph777 wrote:I started using the BTG practice program a couple weeks ago, and I'm getting quite a few supposedly low-level questions incorrect. In fact, I'm often not able to even figure out how to solve them. Has anyone else noticed they're generally more difficult than standard OG questions? Maybe it's the phrasing?

Anyhow, here's a problem I just saw.

If x is a prime number, and x-1 is the median of the set {x-1, 3x +3, 2x-4}, then what is the average (arithmetic mean) of the set?

1. 2
2. 5/3
3. 3
4. 10/3
5. 14/3

OA: D

Here's how I tried so solve, but it was wrong. Can someone explain why this approach is incorrect?

We know the set has 3 terms, and therefore the median is also the mean. So I set up mean equation: mean = sum of terms / number of terms:

x-1 = (x - 1 + 3x + 3 + 2x -4) / 3

3x-3 = 6x - 2
-1=3x
-1/3 = x

And therefore the mean, which is also the media x-1, must equal: -1/3 - 1 = -4/3

And that's not even an answer choice that you might typically see as a fake-out.

Why doesn't this approach work?
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:28 pm
well, I seem to use the stupidest and easiest method hehe

I just dully applied the fist prime number, e.g. 2 and got the answer 10/3
Join the discussion

by rohit_gmat » Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:07 am
jus plug in...

i tried with 7 first and saw that x-1 doesnt become the median, so i went smaller (5 also doesnt)
and got 3.. but the avg wasn't in the list (also the Q doesnt mention "distinct") so i went lower to
2 and that worked (10/3)
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:38 am
This is really a stupid question and the test taker is left with no choice except for trial and error method.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion

by keepintouch_7 » Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:24 pm
Mean = Median only when the elements in a set are evenly spaced i.e the difference between two consecutive elements is constant.
Here is how I did the problem.
Since X is a prime number so x is positive i.e x>= 2 ( 2 is smallest prime)
Arrange the elements in increasing order i.e 2x-4 ,x-1, 3x+3
now 2x-4<x-1=>x<3 ; prime number less than 3 is 2 so x=2
now we can find the mean as 2x-4+x-1+3x+3/3 = 6x-2/3 = 10/3 (putting x=2)
Join the discussion