BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Major fashion brand

Expert replies
by nafishasan » Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:30 am
A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A) The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.

B) The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.

C) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.

D) The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.

E) The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by patanjali.purpose » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:08 am
nafishasan wrote:A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A) The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position.

B) The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion.

C) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position.

D) The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic.

E) The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct.
Conclusion: The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional

The first bold part is refuted by conclusion using 2nd part

A - conclusion does not defen the first
B - first shows cause effect (correct); 2nd is not an evidence - its a judgement (note: LIKELY)
C - First is refuted by argument's conclusion (correct); 2nd supports argument's conclusion (that is refered as POSITION in this choice)
D - first is not the primary logic (2nd is the primary logic that forms basis of argument's position)
E - first is a theory (correct); 2nd invalidates first theory

IMO C
Join the discussion

by mankey » Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:31 am
Is it B?

What is the OA?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by shekhar.kataria » Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:53 am
IMO C. My line of reasoning goes almost in Synch with Patanjali.

Also please tell the source of the Question. I would rather suggest you to put source in every question you post in the forum.
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Join the discussion

by karthikgmat » Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:44 pm
I think in B, the first part is pretty clear and second part just disproves the suggestion but its not an evidence. So confused with B.
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:14 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:30 am
C +1
Join the discussion

by mankey » Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:41 pm
Confused between B and C. Can someone provide a clear reasoning for choosing one over the other.

Regards.
Join the discussion