OG 71

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:2 members

OG 71

by hey_thr67 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:50 am
Roland: The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.
Sharon: But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with one out of 20 workers unemployed. So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, one or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument relies on the assumption that
(A) normal levels of unemployment are rarely exceeded
(B) unemployment is not normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of the population
(C) the number of people who each know someone who is unemployed is always higher than 90 percent of the population
(D) Roland is not consciously distorting the statistics he presents
(E) knowledge that a personal acquaintance is unemployed generates more fear of losing one's job than does knowledge of unemployment statistics

Can anybody answer and explain the choices. Can't find a reasoning here
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:45 am
Firstly one can eliminate all But B because the rest of the choices are irrelevant .
Secondly, One can confirm whether B is the OA by employing the negating test.
If the population is concentrated in isolated segments of society then the chances that a person knows many unemployed people in the society are remote
I Seek Explanations Not Answers