BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Not only X...but also Y

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

Not only X...but also Y

by jain2016 » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:05 am
Fortune favours the brave is a mantra that works not just on the battlefields but in the boardrooms.

A) not just on the battlefields but in the boardrooms

B) not just on the battlefields but also the boardrooms

C) on just the battlefields but also the boardrooms

D) not just on the battlefields but also in the boardrooms

E) not just for the battlefields but also in the boardrooms


Hi Experts ,

The correct is NOT ONLY X.....BUT ALSO Y.

So why OAD

Whats wrong with A

Please advise.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:00 am
jain2016 wrote:Fortune favours the brave is a mantra that works not just on the battlefields but in the boardrooms.

A) not just on the battlefields but in the boardrooms

B) not just on the battlefields but also the boardrooms

C) on just the battlefields but also the boardrooms

D) not just on the battlefields but also in the boardrooms

E) not just for the battlefields but also in the boardrooms


Hi Experts ,

The correct is NOT ONLY X.....BUT ALSO Y.

So why OAD

Whats wrong with A

Please advise.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
This question looks problematic to me. Typically, the idiom will appear as "not only x, but also y," but I've come across official questions in which the correct answer contained, "not only x, but y." Moreover, it's strange to pluralize "battlefield" and "boardroom." I'd ignore this one. What's the source?
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jain2016 » Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:23 pm
Hi David ,

That's why I got confused. This question is from Aristotle SC.

Please share your thoughts.

Thanks,

SJ
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:07 am
This SC seems to have been written by someone with little understanding of American English.

Fortune favours the brave.
Here, the verb in red employs a strictly BRITISH spelling.
In America, we write favor.

on the battlefields...in the boardrooms.
Here, the plural nouns in red seem to refer to a SPECIFIC SET of battlefields and boardrooms.
But the intention is to discuss what is true in ANY GIVEN battlefield or boardroom.
To convey this meaning, we use the SINGULAR versions of the nouns in red, as follows:
a mantra that works both on the BATTLEFIELD and in the BOARDROOM.

I would ignore this SC.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jain2016 » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:56 pm
Hi Mitch ,

Good catch and thanks for your reply.

Also please advise that the uses of NOT.....BUT ALSO is also wrong , Because the correct one is NOT ONLY...BUT ALSO....right?

Please advise .

Thanks,

SJ
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 06, 2016 3:53 am
jain2016 wrote:Hi Mitch ,

Good catch and thanks for your reply.

Also please advise that the uses of NOT.....BUT ALSO is also wrong , Because the correct one is NOT ONLY...BUT ALSO....right?

Please advise .

Thanks,

SJ
Correct idioms:
not only X but also Y
not just X but also Y
not only X but Y.

The OA to SC83 in the OG12:
a phenomenon that is explained NOT JUST by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive BUT ALSO by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions.

An OA from GMATPrep:
Scientists were able NOT ONLY to transform the gas into a solid BUT to create a semiconductor similar to silicon.

Please note that but also does NOT have to be preceded by not only.
An OA from GMATPrep:
The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland, BUT it ALSO caused erosion.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:15 am
A semantic distinction between not only X but also Y and not only X but Y:

Case 1: not only X but also Y
In this case, X and Y are SIMILAR concepts that are INDEPENDENT of each other.
John is not only a talented singer but also an accomplished chef.
Here, Y (John is an accomplished chef) does NOT depend on X (John is a talented singer).

Case 2: not only X but Y
Here, X and Y are SIMILAR concepts that are LINKED to each other.
John not only played well but won the game.
Here, Y (John won the game) is LINKED to X (John played well).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jain2016 » Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:34 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:A semantic distinction between not only X but also Y and not only X but Y:

Case 1: not only X but also Y
In this case, X and Y are SIMILAR concepts that are INDEPENDENT of each other.
John is not only a talented singer but also an accomplished chef.
Here, Y (John is an accomplished chef) does NOT depend on X (John is a talented singer).
Case 2: not only X but Y
Here, X and Y are SIMILAR concepts that are LINKED to each other.
John not only played well but won the game.
Here, Y (John won the game) is LINKED to X (John played well).
Hi Mitch ,

Thanks for your reply.

What I understood from your rely is that if one part is dependent on other, then we should use not only X but Y ; if one part is not dependent on other, then we should use not only X but also Y .

Please advise and correct me if took in wrong way.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:02 am
jain2016 wrote:Hi Mitch ,

Thanks for your reply.

What I understood from your rely is that if one part is dependent on other, then we should use not only X but Y ; if one part is not dependent on other, then we should use not only X but also Y .

Please advise and correct me if took in wrong way.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
Your understanding is correct.
That said, the difference between the two idioms is so subtle that I would not worry about it.
No OA will hinge on this difference.
Just know that both idioms are acceptable, even if they imply a slight difference in meaning.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jain2016 » Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:54 am
Hi Mitch ,

Thanks for your reply. All clear now.

Thanks,

SJ
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1