BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x^2 > 1

Expert replies
by siddhans » Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:52 am
How to solve this ?? Please explain detailed steps?

Method1 :

x^2 > 1


x^2 - 1 > 0

=> (x-1)(x+1) > 0


What next ?

after this?

x > 1 or x < -1 ??? Do the '<' and '>' signs change???

I am confused






Method 2:

X ^2 > 1

x > 1 or x < -1


Are both the methods correct?? Where am i going wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by pemdas » Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:08 am
for x^2>1 I would follow

x>|1| ==> x>1 and x>-1, since -1<x<=1 is not the solution area for x^2>1 we count only x>1

x>1 is the solution for x^2>1
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:11 am
First method:

Whenever the form xy > 0 is seen, this can be interpreted as "x and y are the same sign" or "x and y are both positive or are both negative".

In the case of (x-1)(x+1) > 0, either both the quantities x-1 and x+1 are positive or they are both negative, so we have to consider both cases:

Positive case: x - 1 > 0 AND x + 1 > 0, so x > 1 AND x > -1. x > 1 holds since it is more restrictive.
Negative case: x - 1 < 0 AND x + 1 < 0, so x < 1 AND x < -1. x < -1 holds since it is more restrictive.

From the two cases combined, we have x > 1 OR x < -1.

Second method:

The form x^2 > k^2, where k is some positive number, can be interpreted as |x| > k, or x > k OR x < -k. This simply says that the distance of x from 0 is greater than k.

Both your methods are correct, just different interpretations.

A third method:

Think of the graph of x^2 and how it looks. It will be centered on the y-axis with the point (0,0), decreasing from negative infinity to x=0, and increasing from x=0 to infinity. Think about where this function is greater than 1. It is less than 1 only between -1 and 1, so outside of this range this inequality will hold true.
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:41 am
a bit tricky, as the functional relationship is missing. Instead of y=x^2 we have x^2>1
any solution x>1 will hold true for -x<-1 and this outscores the interval (-1;1) too

Can we use y=x^2 here? A function must be continuous, and here it's not continuous on the interval (-1;1). I guess we will not use y=x^2 along with the last method described.
goalevan wrote: A third method:

Think of the graph of x^2 and how it looks. It will be centered on the y-axis with the point (0,0), decreasing from negative infinity to x=0, and increasing from x=0 to infinity. Think about where this function is greater than 1. It is less than 1 only between -1 and 1, so outside of this range this inequality will hold true.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:35 am
We can represent each side of the inequality as a separate function:

f(x) = x^2
g(x) = 1

See this image:
Attachments
7-10-2011 11-34-48 AM.jpg
Last edited by goalevan on Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:46 pm
@goalevan, I am not sure if GMAT is asking for two functions here.
Moreover, const. function f(x)=1 and f(x)=x^2 should produce the line and the parabola which opens upwards (x^2 positive coefficient, i.e. 1).
If we consider x^2>1 on the left and right-hand sides, then we need to reconsider the function f(x)=1 and convert this to f(x)>1 along the y-abscess, agree?

Perhaps the only way to navigate two functions here would be to draw one vertical asymptote to the graph of a function f(x)=x^2 on the right-hand side.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:04 pm
Take a look at the image, you can see that f(x) = x^2 exceeds g(x) = 1 for x < -1 and x > 1
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:46 am
Whatever goalevan has written is absolutely correct. But with one variation.

There were actually 2 possibilities. (i) as she said x > 1 and x < -1

and Second (ii) as -1 < x < 1

Now try putting as many values as you can and try negating any one of the option...

you will find that when the second case is there it does not suffice the original equation x^2 > 1.

Hence only the 1st case is correct. Thats it.


Hope this helped... Remember it is not enough to just solve an inequality, putting values is also very important. GMAT test on everything...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:02 am
[email protected] wrote:Whatever goalevan has written is absolutely correct. But with one variation.

There were actually 2 possibilities. (i) as she said x > 1 and x < -1

and Second (ii) as -1 < x < 1

Now try putting as many values as you can and try negating any one of the option....
No need to plug in more than 3 values.

x² > 1.
x² - 1 > 0
(x+1)(x-1) > 0.

The CRITICAL POINTS are x=-1 and x=1.
These are the only values where the lefthand side is equal to 0.
To determine the range of x, plug in one value to the left and right of each critical point.
Thus, to determine where x²>1:
Plug in ONE value less than -1, ONE value between -1 and 1, and ONE value greater than 1.

If x=-2, then x² > 1. Thus, x<-1 is part of the range.
If x=0, then x² < 1. Thus, -1<x<1 is NOT part of the range.
If x=2, then x² > 1. Thus, x>1 is part of the range.

Thus, the ranges that satisfy x²>1 are x<-1 and x>1.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion