BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Paper and Plastic bags

Expert replies
by BlueDragon2010 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:55 pm
Paper and plastic grocery bags are a continuing problem for the city, both as litter and in landfills. To discourage their use, the city council has proposed a tax on each bag, to be paid by the supermarkets that supply them. Several environmental groups, however, oppose the tax, despite having brought the issue to the council's attention in the first place.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the environmental groups' opposition to the proposed tax?

(A) The city's current tax revenue is insufficient to pay the cost of recycling paper and plastic grocery bags.

(B) The cost to the city of collecting and disposing of a grocery bag is greater than the proposed tax per bag.

(C) Plastic bags account for 90 percent of the grocery bags that litter the city's streets and take up space in landfills.

(D) Only supermarkets distributing more than a certain number of grocery bags each month would be subject to the proposed tax.

(E) Supermarkets plan to pass the tax on to consumers, who are unlikely to change their behavior based on the small increase in their grocery bills.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Patrick_GMATFix » Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:24 pm
This solution is taken from the GMATFix App. My signature below has more info.

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by Abhishek009 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:05 am
BlueDragon2010 wrote:Paper and plastic grocery bags are a continuing problem for the city, both as litter and in landfills.To discourage their use, the city council has proposed a tax on each bag, to be paid by the supermarkets that supply them. Several environmental groups, however, oppose the tax, despite having brought the issue to the council's attention in the first place.
1. Papaer & plastic bags - Problem ---> (a) Litter , (b) Landfills

2. City Council Proposes Tax on each bag - To be paid by Super markets who supply it.

3. Environmental group brings it to Council's attention ----> Opposes the Tax.

Which of the following, if true, would best explain the environmental groups' opposition to the proposed tax?


(A) The city's current tax revenue is insufficient to pay the cost of recycling paper and plastic grocery bags.

Why will the Environmentalists oppose it , it's a problem related to the Federal Department. The Finance Department will be bothered about the same...

(B) The cost to the city of collecting and disposing of a grocery bag is greater than the proposed tax per bag.

Same as (A) , Environmentalists have no role...

(C) Plastic bags account for 90 percent of the grocery bags that litter the city's streets and take up space in landfills.

Might be , where does Environmentalist come in the picture...

In a supermarket Grocery Bags are also sold along with other goods and the Environmentalists have no direct role here..

(D) Only supermarkets distributing more than a certain number of grocery bags each month would be subject to the proposed tax.

Might be a possible contender...

What about the other part ? Who is going to pay it ? Will this resolve the issue of Environmental Problem ?

Too many questions remain unanswered...

(E) Supermarkets plan to pass the tax on to consumers, who are unlikely to change their behaviour based on the small increase in their grocery bills.

Might be , if Supermarkets pass on the excess tax to the customers , and if customers behaviour remains the same , then the main issue remains unattended...

Environmentalists can oppose this strongly...

Hence (E) seems better than (D)

IMO (D)..
Abhishek
Join the discussion