BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Good one!

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

Good one!

by GmatKiss » Sun May 06, 2012 5:38 am
Because a manufacturer secures a patent for a pharmaceutical compound, the patent does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like it, as long as those chemicals have at least one structural difference with the patented compound.


Because a manufacturer secures a patent for a pharmaceutical compound, the patent does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like it, as long as those chemicals have at least one structural difference with the patented compound

That a manufacturer has secured a patent for one of its pharmaceutical compounds do not bar competitors from producing similar chemicals and having at least one important difference from the patented compound

A patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like the patented compound, as long as the two differ structurally in at least one way

When securing a patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds, competitors are not barred from the production of chemicals such as the patented compound, provided that there is at least one structural difference

Even if a manufacturer secures a patent for one of its pharmaceutical compounds, this does not bar competitors from the production of a chemical such as the patented compound, but having at least one structural difference from it
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:00 am
Thanked: 4 times

by rajcools » Sun May 06, 2012 6:01 am
Because a manufacturer secures a patent for a pharmaceutical compound, the patent does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like it, as long as those chemicals have at least one structural difference with the patented compound

That a manufacturer has secured a patent for one of its pharmaceutical compounds do not bar competitors from producing similar chemicals and having at least one important difference from the patented compound

A patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like the patented compound, as long as the two differ structurally in at least one way - Valid

When securing a patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds, competitors are not barred from the production of chemicals such as the patented compound, provided that there is at least one structural difference

Even if a manufacturer secures a patent for one of its pharmaceutical compounds, this does not bar competitors from the production of a chemical such as the patented compound, [color=]but having at least[/color] one structural difference from it

For C i was skeptical about differ structurally in becuase prefered idiom is differ from but i guess differ in works
Ans - C
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun May 06, 2012 8:57 am
A--"it" is ambiguous; "difference with" is unidiomatic

B--"do not bar" is an agreement error

C--correct (we can use "differ in" because we're not comparing two items (where we'd need "differ from"); rather, we're describing that underlying difference)

D--modifier error; competitors are not securing a patent for a manufacturer's compound

E--the ending clause is incorrect
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Sun May 06, 2012 9:24 am
How is 'A patent for ....' is correct? Doesn't 'A patent of ...' sound better?
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun May 06, 2012 1:14 pm
The company is securing the patent for the product, not securing the patent of the product.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pm
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:720

by ice_rush » Sun May 06, 2012 1:50 pm
Hi Bill,
Isn't the usage of 'this' by itself sufficient to kill (E)? that's how I eliminated it.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun May 06, 2012 2:22 pm
I think that would be safe to say. "This" is ambiguous.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:20 pm
Location: India
GMAT Score:750

by snigdhakul » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:44 am
A patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds does not bar competitors from producing a chemical like the patented compound, as long as the two differ structurally in at least one way
Is this correct? - A patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds...

I marked it wrong because I felt it should be - A patent for one of the manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds...[/quote]
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:23 pm
GMAT Score:640

by p111 » Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:29 am
I have read that one of requires plural noun after it - but in
A patent for "one of a" manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds... OPTION C(OA)

How do we justify "one of a XX Compounds" as plural noun, moreover "one of a" also seems awkward.

Please enlighten.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:01 am
p111 wrote:I have read that one of requires plural noun after it - but in
A patent for "one of a" manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds... OPTION C(OA)
the subject here is "a patent", which is plainly singular. (the "one of..." part isn't relevant, since that's inside a phrase that modifies the subject.)

by the way, you should not try to memorize a rule for "one of the..." and related constructions; that's going to be difficult, if not impossible. on the other hand, it's not very hard to deduce the correct form from context.
see here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/one-of-the-t ... tml#174075

moreover "one of a" also seems awkward.
* you should not use "awkwardness" as a criterion unless english is your native language.

* "one of" and "a" are parts of two different constructions here.
1/
"one of X" (where X is a group of things -- one of my brothers, one of the Southern states, one of twelve people injured in the accident) is a very common construction; it's not "awkward".
2/
in this case, "X" is "a manufacturer's compounds".
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:07 am
snigdhakul wrote:Is this correct? - A patent for one of a manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds...

I marked it wrong because I felt it should be - A patent for one of the manufacturer's pharmaceutical compounds...
you can only use "the X" if at least one of the following is true:
1/ the identity of the particular "X" has already been established/mentioned;
2/ there's only one "X";
3/ you somehow already know which "X" we are talking about.

e.g.

1/
Mark: I left a suitcase and a backpack here.
Security agent: Here's the suitcase, but it seems someone has taken the backpack.
(the agent uses "the" because, once mark has spoken, the identity of the particular suitcase and backpack has been established -- in other words, at that point, we know WHICH suitcase and backpack is under discussion.)

2/
did I tell you about the fight we had last night?
(we had exactly one fight last night)

3/
Pete: Ok, give me the book.
Joe: Which book?
Pete: The book you took out of my bag.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:51 am
all is underlined

the good strategy is to try to get the intended meaing when reading only the original choices.

this stategy is good for all -is -underlined questions but also good for other types of questions.

after reading and trying the understand the intended meaning, there are 2 cases happening.

- we understand the intended meaning. this is great
- we understad part of the meaning and realize the unclear/illogic part of the original sentence

now we are armed with one of 2 above things before reading answer choices. The realization of error will be much easier.


normally for all is underlince the idea A, idea B, and idea C is rearranged to make the illogic sentences. try to make the logic sequence when reading only the original will help much.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1