BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Trichy SC

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:08 am
The ground swell of public opinion made it inevitable that the Senate would approve the president's energy proposals.

(A) it inevitable that the Senate would approve
(B) it inevitable that the Senate had approved
(C) it inevitable of the Senate to approve
(D) inevitable the approval of the Senate of
(E) the approval of the Senate inevitable of

OA [spoiler]after sometime![/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by chetansharma » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:53 am
I guess the answer shd be E

In the original sentence and the options B & C, the word 'It' has Pronoun reference error. It doest not refer back to any noun. And of option D & E, option E looks more apt.

However on second thought, the usage of 'it' also makes sense (in general use). But sticking to the rules of SC (as far as I remember) my answer might be correct.

So what is the OA???

Regards,
Chetan
If my post helped you - let me know by pushing the thanks button :wink:
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:21 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by sumitpune » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:54 am
it may be between A and E

B. HAD ..wrong tense
C. inevitable show intention so "to" or that may follow , at least in this case
D. the approval of the Senate of , looks bad construction

A seems more apt but cant find out error in C as well.
Though E change the meaning .....but looks good too
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:15 pm
i received a private message regarding this thread.

the answer to this problem should definitely be (a).

the pronoun "it" in the first three choices is just fine; this is an example of the only exception to the normal pronoun rules with which you need to be familiar.
for more on that topic, please visit this thread:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/pronoun-ambi ... tml#312862

the verb tense in (b) ("had approved") is nonsense, since that tense suggests that the energy proposals had already been improved by the time of this groundswell in public opinion.
"inevitable" suggests the idea that something cannot be avoided -- but is only used when we are talking about something that hasn't happened yet (or hadn't happened yet, at the time of a past-tense example). therefore, "would" in (a) is a logical tense.

for more on the use of "would" to discuss an action that was in the future at one point, see here:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pos ... tml#p45300

(c) is idiomatically incorrect in two different places -- you can't use "of" or "to" with inevitable -- but, as has been posted elsewhere on this board, gmac has announced that they are no longer testing these kinds of idioms. (they may still test idioms when the idioms involve actual changes in the meaning of the sentence, but, according to the announcement i saw, they won't test random ones like these.)

as for the last two choices, consider the meaning of the sentence: what is the senate going to approve? they are going to approve the president's energy proposals. therefore, it's illogical to insert any other modifiers between "approve" / "approval of" and "the president's energy policies".

by the way, "groundswell" should be one word, not two; i assume this was just mis-transcribed.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1