expressed

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:59 am
Statement (2) is obviously not sufficient.

Statement (1) Instead of doing algebra, substitute y = -2/x in the equation.

You get 6. Hence the expression is correct. Sufficient. AIMO

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:37 am
Location: Durham, NC
Thanked: 154 times
Followed by:74 members
GMAT Score:770

by Whitney Garner » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:11 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, could y be expressed as -2/x?

(1) x^2y^2 - xy = 6

(2) y ≠ 3/x

OA A
Hi jainrahul1985!

This is a tricky little quadratic problem but it looks like the OA is actually incorrect so I'm very glad you PM'd me about it! Can you post the original source and also check to verify that the OA of A is correct - it should be C.

Let's start the same way we should begin every DS problem, by rephrasing the question into something we can work with!

First, we are told that xy ≠ 0, so that means neither x nor y = 0! This is good to know. Now, the question asks:

Does y = -2/x?
Well, let's multiply both sides by x to get that variable out of the denominator:

Does xy = -2?

This is a bit easier to ask, so I think we have sufficiently rephrased. Now on to the statements.

**Statement (1): x^2y^2 - xy = 6
Notice that we have squared variables and non-squared variables, so we should immediately begin to think about quadratics (problems with x^2 and x typically). To solve quadratics, we typically want to have everything set =0, so let's start there:

x^2y^2 - xy - 6 = 0

Now, the un-squared "middle" term contains BOTH an x and a y. So let's lump the first term x and y together. Since the exponents on the x and y are the same, we can actually do the multiplication first (x^2y^2 = (xy)^2):

(xy)^2 - xy - 6 = 0

Now this is starting to look a lot more like a typical quadratic, but instead of a simple x^2 or z^2 or whatever, we have a combo term (xy)^2. To make this easier to see, let's use a little substitution magic and simply call xy = z. Now we can rewrite:

z^2 - z - 6 = 0

Well this looks a lot easier to factor:

(z-3)(z+2) = 0
z = 3, or z = -2.

And since we said that z=xy, then
xy=3, or xy=-2.

But this is not enough to say that xy=-2 (because it could also equal 3), Insufficient, Eliminate A and D from the choices

**Statement (2): y ≠ 3/x
From this, all we know is that the product xy≠3, but this is not enough to say that it does = -2, Insufficient, Elminate Choice B

**Statement (1+2):
From (1) we know that xy could equal either 3 or -2, but from (2) we know that it cannot equal 3, so it must =-2. Sufficient, the correct choice is C

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:17 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, could y be expressed as -2/x?

(1) x^2y^2 - xy = 6

(2) y ≠ 3/x

OA A

I don't think this could ever be a GMAT question - too many problems with the word "could."

Even without using any of the statements, it's possible that y = -2/x

Analogous example: Juan is thinking of an integer between 1 and 10. Could the integer be 7? Sure!

I believe the intent of the question was to have students take x^2y^2 - xy = 6 and set it equal to zero (x^2y^2 - xy - 6 = 0) and then factor it to get (xy-3)(xy+2)=0, with the idea that xy+2 could equal zero, in which case y = -2/x. However, xy+2 could equal zero WITHOUT using statement 2.

I think it might be best to disregard this question.

What's the source?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:18 am
Whitney, I completely agree with your solution.

But the question just asks you if y can be expressed as -2/x.

Even if x*y has 2 values, it can be expressed as -2/x.

Hence won't it be sufficient to just check if satisfies the condition or not? Pls correct me if I am wrong here.

Thanks,

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:32 am
Aside: all DS questions are impossible to answer without using the statements.

For example: If ABC is a triangle, is the area of ABC = 12?
Well, maybe the area equals 12 and maybe it doesn't. We need more info.

Alternatively, consider the question: If ABC is a triangle, could the area of ABC = 12?
There's nothing in the given information that would suggest that the area cannot equal 12. So, at this point (without even looking at any statements), it seems reasonable to conclude that the area could equal 12.

The same applies to the original question.

Now if the target question were"does y = -2/x," then I'd agree with Whitney and say that the answer is C.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:36 am
Haha! I get it Brent.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:37 am
Location: Durham, NC
Thanked: 154 times
Followed by:74 members
GMAT Score:770

by Whitney Garner » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:37 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
jainrahul1985 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, could y be expressed as -2/x?

(1) x^2y^2 - xy = 6

(2) y ≠ 3/x

OA A

I don't think this could ever be a GMAT question - too many problems with the word "could."
Completely Agree Brent! A search of all 12th Ed OG problems and 2nd Ed Quant Supplement problems and NO DS problems use the word "could" in this context. I second my request for the original source.

:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:

Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:32 am
I was about to write what Brent has written then read the posts. I was simply going to write 'Yes' as my answer :)

PS: I think I read a similar question posted in BTG sometime back, which had 'could' in it...