Christopher Columbus

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 9:05 am

by AsadAbu » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:59 am
lunarpower wrote:
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:The exception that you brought up ("the chairman and CEO" being the same person) is not something I recall seeing on an official question.
The official problems have tested "x and y" as a singular noun before, but never without proof.

E.g., OG13 #85, in which "owning and living..." is a singular noun.
* It's actually essential to recognize that "owning and living" is singular. If you assume by default that it's plural because of the "and", you'll eliminate the correct answer (in which "it" stands for this noun).
* The problem contains proof that "owning and living" is singular, in the form of the verb "is" (in the non-underlined part).

In general:
* "x and y" can be singular-but only if you have positive proof that it is so.
* If there's no proof otherwise, it's safe to assume that "x and y" is plural.
"owning and living="bread and butter"=singular noun because there is good relation between "bread and butter" & "owing and living". If there is no relation like that, then it MUST be PLURAL noun. Ron, am I right? Thanks...

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 9:05 am

by AsadAbu » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:29 am
lunarpower wrote:
namans wrote:I am not sure if this is the best eg... say a parallel structure:
A knows that B is faster than C, that C is faster than D, and that D is faster than E

Here the that does not necessarily refer to the immediate preceding noun, but refers to A.

Is the understanding correct?
In that structure, the clauses starting with "that" are not modifiers at all. They play the role of nouns. There's probably some fancy grammar term for that; I don't know.
In any case, nouns don't refer to anything, so neither do these modifiers.

Here are some examples-first with a noun, and second with "that xxx" playing the role of the noun.

Your punctuality was a surprise to everyone.
That you were on time was a surprise to everyone.

She told me the rumor.
She told me that Rachel might be moving to Italy.


Your structure is the same. It's equivalent to, say, "A knows biology, chemistry, and physics."
Hi Ron,
I'm little bit confused in the underlined parts of this comments. when something is used instead of NOUN, then it is called PRONOUN. Here, THAT is used in stead of ''devastation and enslavement''. So, my question is: How THAT play role as NOUN here? Thanks...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:08 am
Thanked: 1 times

by TheGraduate » Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:23 pm
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
Could C and D be eliminated on the basis of the fact that what follows after personify ought to be in the noun form? i.e. devastating and enslaving are not noun form while devastation and enslavement are.

Also, could anyone please explain the error in B?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:44 pm
TheGraduate wrote:Could C and D be eliminated on the basis of the fact that what follows after personify ought to be in the noun form? i.e. devastating and enslaving are not noun form while devastation and enslavement are.
In most cases, an action noun (such as devastation) will be preferable to a VERBing (such as devastating).
Whereas C and D each employ two VERBings (devastating and enslaving), E employs an action noun (the devastation and enslavement).
Since E is free of errors, eliminate C and D and choose E.
Also, could anyone please explain the error in B?
Check my post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sc-that-vers ... 81349.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3