BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Algebra - Ratios

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pmFollowed by: 523 members
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:15 pm
anirudhbhalotia wrote:If r> 0 and s>0, is r/s < s/r ?

1. r/3s = 1/4
2. s = r + 4
Statement 1: (r/3s) = 1/4
Implies, (r/s) = 3/4 => (s/r) = 4/3
Hence, (r/s) < (s/r)

Sufficient

Statement 2: s = (r + 4)
Dividing both side by r, (s/r) = 1 + (4/r) > 1
And dividing both side by s, 1 = (r/s) + (4/s) => (r/s) = 1 - (4/s) < 1

Hence (r/s) < (s/r)

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:12 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Dominican Republic
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:480

by MAAJ » Fri Jan 14, 2011 5:11 am
For the second statement you can also do this:

(r/s) < (s/r) ?

Because they are both positive, you can cross-multiply

r²< s² ?

Statement 2 tell us that s= r+4 so:

r² < (r+4)² ?

Because "r" is a positive number, r² will always by less than (r+4)², making this statement sufficient.
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:18 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 5 times

by anirudhbhalotia » Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:10 am
MAAJ wrote:For the second statement you can also do this:

(r/s) < (s/r) ?

Because they are both positive, you can cross-multiply

r²< s² ?

Statement 2 tell us that s= r+4 so:

r² < (r+4)² ?

Because "r" is a positive number, r² will always by less than (r+4)², making this statement sufficient.
Cool!

Was a bit confused as to how did Anurag suffice the 2nd statement!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:37 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: Varanasi
Thanked: 11 times

by ankur.agrawal » Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:00 am
MAAJ wrote:For the second statement you can also do this:

(r/s) < (s/r) ?

Because they are both positive, you can cross-multiply

r²< s² ?

Statement 2 tell us that s= r+4 so:

r² < (r+4)² ?

Because "r" is a positive number, r² will always by less than (r+4)², making this statement sufficient.

For the statement 2 we can do this:

s=r+4: putting this value:

r/r+4<r+4/r. From this it is clear that LHS will be <1 & RHS will be >1.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:32 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: India
GMAT Score:550

by vikrambansal » Mon May 18, 2015 5:28 pm
Can we simplify r/s < s/r

= r^2 < s^2 (cross multiply. No change in inequality as both r & s are +ve)

= r < s (taking square root)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon May 18, 2015 5:41 pm
vikrambansal wrote:Can we simplify r/s < s/r

= r^2 < s^2 (cross multiply. No change in inequality as both r & s are +ve)

= r < s (taking square root)
Perfect!
The KEY is that r and s are both POSITIVE

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1