BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Industrialised Nations

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

Industrialised Nations

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:25 am
Hi All,

Can somebody please help me in the below question. I am stuck between [spoiler]"D" and "E"[/spoiler]. OA [spoiler]is "E"[/spoiler]

The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have an economy free of inflation.

(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

Thanks
Mohit
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:12 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:720

by uymba » Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:20 am
OA is E ?
What is the source?

At first sight i would choose B o C because it seems more "parallel seriuosly impact and severely impede". However, i'm not sure whether impede changes the meaning. In this context perhaps yes.

So, getting with E or D, i would choose E because it uses diminish as the original sentence.

Can anybody else make an opinion?

What about the parallelism of the adverbs in B & C? Does impede changes the meaning?

(impede = make more difficult)
(diminish = reduce). I believe that you reduce a possibility and you don't make it more difficult. More opinions?

Finally, IMO E.

Thanks.
=============
Go for 700+!!
https://mbajourney12.blocked/
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:36 pm
Experts Kindly share your opinion.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by Jatinder » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:00 am
This may help:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/rise-in-the- ... 25653.html
Keep flying
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:26 pm
Thanks Jatinder.
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:28 am

by greatsaint » Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:03 pm
Its "E" in my opinion. Let me know whats the correct answer
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:37 pm
As mentioned in the original post...OA is "E"....
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:28 am
all of (a), (b), (c), (d) contain unidiomatic constructions.

in (a), "possibility to have" is unidiomatic. moreover, "...be a serious impact" doesn't make any sense; unless you're talking about a literal, physical impact, you should say "have an impact".

(b) "possibility to have" is unidiomatic.
also, you can't use "on" with the VERB "impact"; "on" only goes with the NOUN "impact". as a verb, "impact" takes a direct object (i.e., no prepositions).

(c) you can't use "on" with the VERB "impact"; "on" only goes with the NOUN "impact". as a verb, "impact" takes a direct object (i.e., no prepositions).

(d) "possibility to have" is unidiomatic.

--

also, you can't impede a possibility; you can only impede actions or processes.

--

this is still a badly written question, though. the gmat here would almost certainly just write "...possibility of an economy...".
in fact, the word have/having is actually WRONG here, since the sentence doesn't mention who "has" the economy.

mohit, where are you getting all these sloppily written questions?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1