BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG problem: a fast way to factor?

Expert replies
by massi2884 » Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:22 am
[spoiler]OA is B However could you please explain a fast way to go from t^2 +4t -672 = 0 to (t-24)(t+28) ? I spent a lot of time finding the two values 28 and 24, is there a fast way to factor?[/spoiler]

At his regular hourly rate, Don had estimated the labor cost of a repair job as $336 and he was paid that amount. However, the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned 2$ per hour less than his regular hourly rate. What was the time Don had estimated for the job, in hours?

28
24
16
14
12

[spoiler]OA is B However could you please explain a fast way to go from t^2 +4t -672 = 0 to (t-24)(t+28) ? I spent a lot of time finding the two values 28 and 24, is there a fast way to factor?[/spoiler]

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:11 am
I think the fastest way to solve is to avoid the quadratic. We can set up two equations (r=hourly rate, h=hours)

Theoretical job: 336=rh
Actual job: 336=(r-2)(h+4)

We can expand that second equation:

336 = rh + 4r - 2h -8

Conveniently, we now have an rh term, which the first equation tells us is equal to 336. Let's substitute:

336 = 336 + 4r - 2h - 8
0 = 4r - 2h - 8
8 = 4r -2h
4 = 2r - h

h=2r - 4

At this point, I started working with the answer choices, which give us values for h. If h=16, then the rate is $10. Does $10 * 16 = 336? No, so our h value must be larger, leaving A and B as possibilities.

If h=24, then the rate is $14. Does $24 * 14 = 336? Yes. That means that B is the correct answer.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by shubham_k » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:17 am
the immediate factors of 336 can be formed and they are, (2^4)*3*7. Thus we see that 28 16 and 14 cannot be the answer as 32 (28+4) (2^5), 20 (16+4) (2*2*5)and 18 (14+4) (3*3*2) are not factors of 336.Now only 24 and 12 are remaining and we can now without much effort can find the answer to be 24.

Please note this an alternate method apart from the normal unitary method approach by assuming the hourly wage to be x and number of hours to be t and forming basic equations and solving.

Please click on thanks icon if you feel this has helped you.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:21 am
massi2884 wrote:[spoiler]OA is B However could you please explain a fast way to go from t^2 +4t -672 = 0 to (t-24)(t+28) ? I spent a lot of time finding the two values 28 and 24, is there a fast way to factor?[/spoiler]

At his regular hourly rate, Don had estimated the labor cost of a repair job as $336 and he was paid that amount. However, the job took 4 hours longer than he had estimated and, consequently, he earned 2$ per hour less than his regular hourly rate. What was the time Don had estimated for the job, in hours?

28
24
16
14
12

[spoiler]OA is B However could you please explain a fast way to go from t^2 +4t -672 = 0 to (t-24)(t+28) ? I spent a lot of time finding the two values 28 and 24, is there a fast way to factor?[/spoiler]

Thanks.
We can plug in the answers, which represent the estimated time: 28, 24, 16, 14, or 12.
The actual time was 4 hours longer: 32, 28, 20, 18, or 16.
Since 336 is not a multiple of 32, eliminate A.
Since 336 is not a multiple of 20, eliminate C.
336 is not a multiple of 9, since the sum of its digits is not a multiple of 9.
Thus, 336 is not a multiple of 18; eliminate D.

The correct answer must be B or E.

Answer choice B: estimated time = 24, actual time = 28
Estimated payrate = 336/24 = 14.
Actual payrate = 336/28 = 12.
Difference = 14-12 = 2.
Success!

The correct answer is B.

Note that we had to try only ONE answer choice -- a very efficient way to solve the problem.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Birottam Dutta » Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:23 am
The fastest way of solving such problems is to straightaway check the options and see which of them fits the given condition.

Divide 336 by the options 28, 24, 16, 14 and 12.

We get, 12, 14, 21, 24 and 28. These are the values for the hourly wages. In these wages, we see that only 12 and 14 have a difference of 2, which is the requirement of the question statement.

Hence, as per the problem statement, the initial estimated hours were 24 at a wage of 14 per hour. It took 28 hours and so hourly wage became 12.

-------

If you feel like a thanks, click it :)
Join the discussion