-
[email protected]
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
- Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
- Thanked: 63 times
- Followed by:14 members
Experts please help as in the 700 level question set we are facing a lot of problems in identifying the premise and the conclusion.
take the following example...
While political discourse and the media in the United States have focused on the rise of job outsourcing, few have mentioned the sharp fall of talent "insourcing," or the drop in enrollment of foreign-born graduate students since 2001, and its dire results. The decrease in such insourcing will hurt America's competitiveness in basic research and applied technology, with serious consequences for years to come. The de-internationalization of graduate programs across the country will also negatively affect the global outlook and experience of the American students
remaining in those programs; they will not have the opportunity to learn about foreign cultures directly from members of those cultures. What distinguishes the decline of talent insourcing from the rise of job outsourcing is that the former can be easily rectified by a policy change of the United States government.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the author's claim regarding the impact of decreased insourcing in America?
A] What is the cost to reverse the trend of insourcing in America?
B] How does insourcing replace domestic jobs lost from outsourcing?
C] Since 2001, what has been the decrease in the number of foreign-born students in America?
D] What opportunities do American graduate students have to interact regularly with foreigners who are not students?
E] What effect would a government policy have on the number of foreign graduate students?
The OA is E.
Please identify the premise and the conclusion for me and also give explanation... Experts please help...
take the following example...
While political discourse and the media in the United States have focused on the rise of job outsourcing, few have mentioned the sharp fall of talent "insourcing," or the drop in enrollment of foreign-born graduate students since 2001, and its dire results. The decrease in such insourcing will hurt America's competitiveness in basic research and applied technology, with serious consequences for years to come. The de-internationalization of graduate programs across the country will also negatively affect the global outlook and experience of the American students
remaining in those programs; they will not have the opportunity to learn about foreign cultures directly from members of those cultures. What distinguishes the decline of talent insourcing from the rise of job outsourcing is that the former can be easily rectified by a policy change of the United States government.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the author's claim regarding the impact of decreased insourcing in America?
A] What is the cost to reverse the trend of insourcing in America?
B] How does insourcing replace domestic jobs lost from outsourcing?
C] Since 2001, what has been the decrease in the number of foreign-born students in America?
D] What opportunities do American graduate students have to interact regularly with foreigners who are not students?
E] What effect would a government policy have on the number of foreign graduate students?
The OA is E.
Please identify the premise and the conclusion for me and also give explanation... Experts please help...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
