-
khurram
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:39 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:1 members
In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.
The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?
A Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
B Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
C The undated document was written before 1765.
D The arrest record was written after the undated document.
E The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.
A -Out of Scope
B -Out of Scope
C Maybe yes maybe No, But not Definitive
D- Maybe Yes
E-Out of Scope
Ans is C but why cannot it be D.
Thanks
Khurram
The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?
A Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
B Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
C The undated document was written before 1765.
D The arrest record was written after the undated document.
E The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.
A -Out of Scope
B -Out of Scope
C Maybe yes maybe No, But not Definitive
D- Maybe Yes
E-Out of Scope
Ans is C but why cannot it be D.
Thanks
Khurram













