BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

GMATPrep: moving to Florida impact on economy ...

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 5 times

Re: GMATPrep: moving to Florida impact on economy ...

by vinaynp » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:20 am
California4jx wrote:very surprisingly ... OA is D - I chose C .... why D ?
The argument says that the businesses catering to retired people (RP) will suffer as there is a % decrease of retired people.

C) is pointing to business in general and not business catered for retired people.

D) aptly says that even though % has decreases the number of retired people has increased.


Hence D). Hope this helps.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:16 am
Location: San Francisco
Thanked: 14 times

by mbadrew » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:38 pm
OA makes no sense at all. I also chose C.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:43 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:650

Re: GMATPrep: moving to Florida impact on economy ...

by California4jx » Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:00 am
vinaynp wrote:
California4jx wrote:very surprisingly ... OA is D - I chose C .... why D ?
The argument says that the businesses catering to retired people (RP) will suffer as there is a % decrease of retired people.

C) is pointing to business in general and not business catered for retired people.

D) aptly says that even though % has decreases the number of retired people has increased.


Hence D). Hope this helps.
but how does it relates to the economy in Florida ? - In my opinion, D is out of scope.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:16 am
Location: San Francisco
Thanked: 14 times

by mbadrew » Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:09 am
D--actually strengthens the arguement, because it shows that relocation of retirees has increased in other states and it doesn't mention anything about Florida.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 5 times

Re: GMATPrep: moving to Florida impact on economy ...

by vinaynp » Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:42 am
California4jx wrote:
vinaynp wrote:
California4jx wrote:very surprisingly ... OA is D - I chose C .... why D ?
The argument says that the businesses catering to retired people (RP) will suffer as there is a % decrease of retired people.

C) is pointing to business in general and not business catered for retired people.

D) aptly says that even though % has decreases the number of retired people has increased.


Hence D). Hope this helps.
but how does it relates to the economy in Florida ? - In my opinion, D is out of scope.
Let us assume that the businesses serving retired people can serve 5 retirees.

10 years back: 5% of 100 retirees used to come to Florida. Everything was great.

In 10 years, there is a drop in the % from 5% to 2%. Let us suppose that the number of retirees have increase to 100 to 300. 2% of 300 is 6. Hence, the businesses will not suffer.

This is exactly what is being offered by D).

I hope this helps.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

by getso » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:09 am
The conclusion is based on the argument that number of retires who move to Florida has reduced when compared to last year, this reduction impacts the business.

However D aptly points that number of retires has been decreasing for the last 10 years and weakens the argument that business is not impacted by decrease in retires moving to Florida.

Hope this helps...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:43 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:650

Re: GMATPrep: moving to Florida impact on economy ...

by California4jx » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:08 am
vinaynp wrote:
California4jx wrote:
vinaynp wrote:
California4jx wrote:very surprisingly ... OA is D - I chose C .... why D ?
The argument says that the businesses catering to retired people (RP) will suffer as there is a % decrease of retired people.

C) is pointing to business in general and not business catered for retired people.

D) aptly says that even though % has decreases the number of retired people has increased.


Hence D). Hope this helps.
but how does it relates to the economy in Florida ? - In my opinion, D is out of scope.
Let us assume that the businesses serving retired people can serve 5 retirees.

10 years back: 5% of 100 retirees used to come to Florida. Everything was great.

In 10 years, there is a drop in the % from 5% to 2%. Let us suppose that the number of retirees have increase to 100 to 300. 2% of 300 is 6. Hence, the businesses will not suffer.

This is exactly what is being offered by D).

I hope this helps.
great explanation, thanks !
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:16 am
Location: San Francisco
Thanked: 14 times

by mbadrew » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:36 am
getso wrote:The conclusion is based on the argument that number of retires who move to Florida has reduced when compared to last year, this reduction impacts the business.

However D aptly points that number of retires has been decreasing for the last 10 years and weakens the argument that business is not impacted by decrease in retires moving to Florida.

Hope this helps...
D--doesn't mention a decrease in retirees, rather an increase. So, I'm assuming that most will end up in Florida and, therefore, businesses will not suffer.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:26 pm
I will Go with option D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1