(B), like (D), shows that overcrowding doesn't always lead to lower reading scores, but as my above post discusses, this is not actually a weakener, because it only argues that overcrowding may be insufficient to cause lower reading scores. Only (E) presents evidence that, in fact, reading scores may be low without overcrowding, and thus overcrowding is not a necessary condition, thus refuting the Causation.navdeepbajwa wrote:Hi Staurt
Why B is not the answer and E is as B also says there is another cause for lower reading scores
kaplan explanation says (B)and (D) point to overcrowding without declining skills how this is true since lower reading scores also means declining skills
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemCausation question
- Adam@Knewton
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:26 pm
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 68 times
- Followed by:37 members
- GMAT Score:780
Prep Smarter, Score Higher
www.knewton.com
www.knewton.com