BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Weight

Expert replies
by yellowho » Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:24 am
Zach picked some pumpkins to give to Ann, Beth and Chuck. He gave the 2 heaviest pumpkins to
Ann, and the 5 lightest pumpkins to Beth. The combined weight of the two heaviest pumpkins is
25% of the total weight of all the pumpkins Zach picked. The combined weight of the five lightest
pumpkins is 45% of the total weight of all the pumpkins Zach picked. How many pumpkins did Zach
give Chuck?


Heaviest =25%
Lightest= 45%
Both= 70% and remaining is 30%
45%/5= 9%
Since Z's is greater than 9%, if 10% then 3.

I'm I doing this right? I made big assumptions here.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:12 am
yellowho wrote:Zach picked some pumpkins to give to Ann, Beth and Chuck. He gave the 2 heaviest pumpkins to Ann, and the 5 lightest pumpkins to Beth. The combined weight of the two heaviest pumpkins is 25% of the total weight of all the pumpkins Zach picked. The combined weight of the five lightest pumpkins is 45% of the total weight of all the pumpkins Zach picked. How many pumpkins did Zach give Chuck?

...

I'm I doing this right? I made big assumptions here.
Yes, you're doing right.
But as you're not looking confident, I assume that you're not doing it with a concrete reason...

Say, the required number = z
As you have said, the combined weight of these z pumpkins must be 30% of the total weight of all the pumpkins. This means the average weight of these z pumpkins must be (30/z)% of the total weight of all the pumpkins.

Now, as these z pumpkins are of medium weight, then their average must be greater than the average weight of the 5 lightest pumpkins but less than the average weight of the 2 heaviest pumpkins.

Hence, 9 < (30/z) < 12.5
=> (30/12.5) < z < (30/9)
=> 2.(something) < z < 3.(something)

As z must be an integer, only possible value of z is 3.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by aleph777 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:22 am
Yellowho

Another way to deal with this is in terms of fractions, and you can cut down on your total computation.

25% = 1/4
45% = 45/100 or 9/20

So let's add these two together and see what fraction of the total amount we have:

1/4 + 9/20 = 5/20 + 9/20 = 14/20
Then reduce 14/20 to 7/10.

So you know that Ann and Beth have 7 out of 10 pumpkins, which means Zach received the three left over.
Join the discussion

by samrendra4u » Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:51 am
aleph777 wrote:Yellowho

Another way to deal with this is in terms of fractions, and you can cut down on your total computation.

25% = 1/4
45% = 45/100 or 9/20

So let's add these two together and see what fraction of the total amount we have:

1/4 + 9/20 = 5/20 + 9/20 = 14/20
Then reduce 14/20 to 7/10.

So you know that Ann and Beth have 7 out of 10 pumpkins, which means Zach received the three left over.


Great Approach! :D
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:52 am
aleph777 wrote:Another way to deal with this is in terms of fractions, and you can cut down on your total computation.

25% = 1/4
45% = 45/100 or 9/20

So let's add these two together and see what fraction of the total amount we have:

1/4 + 9/20 = 5/20 + 9/20 = 14/20
Then reduce 14/20 to 7/10.

So you know that Ann and Beth have 7 out of 10 pumpkins, which means Zach received the three left over.
I think you got lucky for this problem with this method.
Frankly, only from ratio, we can't determine the numbers.

Also here the ratios are of weight of some pumpkins. What is your logic behind treating them as the ratio of numbers of pumpkin?

Now why you got lucky...
If I change the problem from 2 heaviest pumpkins to a single heavy pumpkin, i.e. only a single pumpkin whose weight is 25% of the total weight of all the pumpkins is given to Ann, then according to your method the result should be 4. Right? But actually that's not true. If that is the case, then there is two possible results, either 2 or 3.

A simple intuitive explanation behind it is when a single pumpkin weighs 25% of the whole, then number of medium weighted pumpkin cannot increase considering the number and weight percentage of light weighted pumpkins remain the same. But according to your method the number is increasing which is not possible.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by yellowho » Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:45 pm
How did you go from: 9 < (30/z) < 12.5
To: (30/12.5) < z < (30/9)






[quote="Rahul@gurome"][quote="yellowho"]Zach picked some pumpkins to give to Ann, Beth and Chuck. He gave the 2 heaviest pumpkins to Ann, and the 5 lightest pumpkins to Beth. The combined weight of the two heaviest pumpkins is 25% of the total weight of all the pumpkins Zach picked. The combined weight of the five lightest pumpkins is 45% of the total weight of all the pumpkins Zach picked. How many pumpkins did Zach give Chuck?

...

I'm I doing this right? I made big assumptions here.[/quote]

Yes, you're doing right.
But as you're not looking confident, I assume that you're not doing it with a concrete reason...

Say, the required number = z
As you have said, the combined weight of these z pumpkins must be 30% of the total weight of all the pumpkins. This means the average weight of these z pumpkins must be (30/z)% of the total weight of all the pumpkins.

Now, as these z pumpkins are of medium weight, then their average must be greater than the average weight of the 5 lightest pumpkins but less than the average weight of the 2 heaviest pumpkins.

Hence, 9 < (30/z) < 12.5
=> (30/12.5) < z < (30/9)
=> 2.(something) < z < 3.(something)

As z must be an integer, only possible value of z is 3.[/quote]
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:26 pm
yellowho wrote:How did you go from: 9 < (30/z) < 12.5
To: (30/12.5) < z < (30/9)
You can do that in any of the following way.

Method - 1
Note that, 9 < (30/z) < 12.5 is actually two inequalities,
  • 1. 9 < (30/z) => z < (30/9)
    AND
    2. (30/z) < 12.5 => z > (30/12.5)
Combine the results => (30/12.5) < z < (30/9)

Method - 2
Apply the concept that if you reciprocate all the terms in a inequality, all the inequality signs also reciprocates, i.e. x > 1 => (1/x) < 1.
  • Thus, 9 < (30/z) < 12.5
    => (1/9) > (z/30) > (1/12.5)
    => (30/9) > z > (z/12.5)
    => (30/12.5) < z < (30/9)
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion